<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://repository.monashhealth.org:80/monashhealthjspui">
    <title>Monash Health</title>
    <link>http://repository.monashhealth.org:80/monashhealthjspui</link>
    <description>The Monash Health digital repository system captures, stores, indexes, preserves, and distributes digital research material.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57340" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57341" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57338" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57339" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-03-08T19:33:46Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57340">
    <title>Building a Dataset for Emergency Care by Identifying Consumer-Informed Quality Indicators: An Analysis of Focus Group Discussions.</title>
    <link>https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57340</link>
    <description>Title: Building a Dataset for Emergency Care by Identifying Consumer-Informed Quality Indicators: An Analysis of Focus Group Discussions.
Authors: Solly E.; O'Reilly G.M.; Flemming-Judge E.; Clay F.J.; Johnston A.; Parker S.J.; Craig S.
Abstract: Objective: To develop a clearer understanding of what 'quality in emergency care' means from the perspective of patients and families to assist with the development of consumer-informed measures of quality for emergency care in an Australian setting. Method(s): Qualitative analysis of transcripts from three semi-structured focus groups, with 24 participants recruited using purposive sampling from a pre-existing consumer expert Safer Care Victoria (SCV) panel. The focus groups were audio-recorded, transcribed and de-identified. Thematic analysis was performed using NVivo software. Result(s): Six major themes were identified: Staff-patient interactions, Provision of information, Time spent in the ED, Emotional experience, Needs of specific groups and Perception of the emergency care system. Patient and carer experiences of accessing emergency care are highly influenced by the nature of their interactions with staff and the ease and accessibility of information exchange. Prolonged ED wait times are a negative experience; however, this can be improved with attention to symptom management, comfort and privacy. The needs of priority patient groups (e.g., patients with disabilities or people of older age) may be frequently overlooked in ED settings. Participants in this study reported that many of the negative aspects of emergency care they experienced may be attributed to the system being overburdened/staff having insufficient time. Conclusion(s): Consumer-informed measures of quality in emergency care should address staff-patient interactions, emotional experience, information provision, time spent in the ED and be sensitive to the needs of priority groups.Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Emergency Medicine Australasia published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian College for Emergency Medicine.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57341">
    <title>Barriers and facilitators reported by older adults and Physical Education professionals participating in a home-based physical exercise program with different remote supervision strategies: a qualitative analysis of a randomized controlled trial.</title>
    <link>https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57341</link>
    <description>Title: Barriers and facilitators reported by older adults and Physical Education professionals participating in a home-based physical exercise program with different remote supervision strategies: a qualitative analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
Authors: dos Santos H.L.T.; dos Santos A.R.M.; Maranhao D.C.M.; de Araujo Silva J.D.; de Albuquerque D.B.; Scott D.; Piraua A.L.T.
Abstract: This study examined barriers and facilitators reported by older adults and Physical Education professionals in a home-based exercise program with two types of supervision: video calls and text messages. A qualitative case study was conducted with 12 older adults and three professionals from a randomized controlled trial in Brazil. Interviews, which lasted between 12 and 35 min, were guided by the Theory of Planned Behavior and analyzed using thematic content analysis. Both groups identified well-being and supervision as facilitators. Barriers included scheduling conflicts and mobile device difficulties. Text message supervision led to insecurity in exercise performance, while video call supervision faced barriers like poor internet. Professionals noted older adults' technological unfamiliarity. Video call supervision facilitated social interaction, while text messages offered reduced time commitment and better accessibility. The study concluded that video call supervision supports social interaction, while text message supervision may cause insecurity due to lack of real-time guidance.Copyright © 2026 The Author(s).</description>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57338">
    <title>Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.</title>
    <link>https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57338</link>
    <description>Title: Diagnostic tests for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in preschool children.
Authors: Brignell A.; Chan K.; Chellew T.; Maddumahewa C.V.; Wong N.; Hooft L.; Alshawsh M.; Williams K.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (diagnostic). The objectives are as follows: Primary objectives To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of widely used ASD diagnostic tools (specifically CARS, GARS, ADOS, ADI-R, DISCO, 3di) in preschool children, compared with multidisciplinary team clinical judgement. We aim to: summarise sensitivity, specificity, and other accuracy measures for each ASD diagnostic tool; and for studies that compare two or more tools within the same study, describe and compare their diagnostic accuracy. To identify if any combination of diagnostic tools has greater diagnostic test accuracy than each single tool. We aim to: describe combined diagnostic test accuracy within a single study; and compare combined diagnostic test accuracy to individual test accuracy from primary objective 1a. Secondary objectives To assess whether there is different diagnostic test accuracy for subgroups such as intellectual disability, language level, setting, prospective versus retrospective, DSM diagnostic classification and specific ages (within the preschool age range).Copyright © 2026 The Authors. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Cochrane Collaboration.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57339">
    <title>Successful treatment with upadacitinib for tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced palmoplantar pustulosis following infliximab therapy for ulcerative colitis.</title>
    <link>https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/57339</link>
    <description>Title: Successful treatment with upadacitinib for tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor-induced palmoplantar pustulosis following infliximab therapy for ulcerative colitis.
Authors: Hu B.C.; Lai F.Y.; Lee S.</description>
    <dc:date>2026-02-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

