Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53188
Title: ImpACT project: improving access to clinical trials in Victoria, an artificial intelligence-based approach.
Authors: Bechelli M.L.;Ivanova K.;Tan S.S.;Kumar B. ;Swiatek D.;Arulananda S.;Evans S.M.
Monash Health Department(s): Oncology
Institution: (Bechelli, Ivanova, Evans) Victorian Cancer Registry, Cancer Council Victoria, VIC, Australia
(Tan, Kumar, Arulananda) Department of Medical Oncology, Monash Health, VIC, Australia
(Kumar, Arulananda) School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia
(Swiatek) Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, VIC, Australia
(Swiatek) Faculty of Health, Deakin University, VIC, Australia
(Swiatek) School of Cancer Medicine, La Trobe University, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 11-Feb-2025
Copyright year: 2025
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 9(no pagination), 2025. Article Number: e2400137. Date of Publication: 01 Jan 2025.
Journal: JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
Abstract: PURPOSE: Enhancing the speed and efficiency of clinical trial recruitment is a key objective across international health systems. This study aimed to use artificial intelligence (AI) applied in the Victorian Cancer Registry (VCR), a population-based cancer registry, to assess (1) if VCR received all relevant pathology reports for three clinical trials, (2) AI accuracy in auto-extracting information from pathology reports for recruitment, and (3) the number of participants approached for trial enrollment using the AI approach compared with standard hospital-based recruitment.METHODSTo verify pathology report accessibility for VCR trial enrollment, reports from the laboratory were cross-referenced. To determine the accuracy of a Rapid Case Ascertainment (RCA) module of the AI software in extracting key clinical variables from the pathology report, data were compared with manually reviewed reports. To examine the effectiveness of the AI recruitment approach, the number of patients approached for recruitment was compared with standard practice.RESULTSOf the 195 reports provided by the pathology laboratory, 185 (94.9%) were received by VCR, 73 of 195 (37.4%) were eligible for the studies, and 5 of 73 (6.8%) eligible cases had not been received by the VCR. The RCA module demonstrated an accuracy of 93% and an F1 score of 0.94 in extracting key clinical variables. However, the RCA false-positive rate was 10% and the false-negative rate was 5%. The standard hospital approach selected fewer cases for approach to clinical trials compared with the RCA module approach, 8 of 336 (2.4%) versus 12 of 336 (3.6%), respectively.CONCLUSIONUsing AI to screen potentially eligible cases for recruitment to three clinical trials resulted in a 50% increase in eligible cases being approached for enrollment.Copyright © 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1200/CCI.24.00137
PubMed URL: 39787436
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53188
Type: Article
Subjects: artificial intelligence
cancer registry
colorectal cancer
non small cell lung cancer
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

400
checked on Jul 10, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.