Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/26971
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLowthian J.en
dc.contributor.authorOgrin R.en
dc.contributor.authorDickins M.en
dc.contributor.authorJohnstone G.en
dc.contributor.authorMortimer D.en
dc.contributor.authorIezzi A.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:00:48Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:00:48Zen
dc.date.copyright2020en
dc.date.created20191105en
dc.date.created20210317en
dc.date.issued2020-03-01en
dc.identifier.citationHealth & social care in the community. 28 (2) (pp 494-504), 2020. Date of Publication: 01 Mar 2020.en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2524 (electronic)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/26971en
dc.description.abstractFor many populations at risk of social isolation, including Older Women Living Alone (OWLA), existing services to maintain independence and optimise well-being are difficult to access, unsuitable or unavailable. Co-creation is a strategy to develop 'person-centred' services that meet the needs of individuals. We adapted an existing framework for co-creation and used participatory action research methods, supported by an evidence base comprising a systematic review, analysis of routinely collected data and interviews, to develop person-centred services for OWLA. This approach achieved co-creation through an iterative process of consultation and review, involving a series of facilitated discussions with women living alone and stakeholders. A total of 13 women living alone, aged >=55 years, and 11 stakeholders representing service providers and advocacy groups, were recruited to participate in these discussions. Sessions with between three and five OWLA, were held across Melbourne. The information was compiled and presented to service stakeholders in a single facilitated forum, held in central Melbourne. Smaller facilitated sessions with OWLA followed, to review and discuss the collated service stakeholder input. The information from these OWLA sessions were again compiled and directed back to the service stakeholders for consideration and further discussion. The two groups came together for a final forum to prioritise the co-created ten services that they believed would be feasible and would address unmet need to support OWLA maintain independence. The process of co-creation was time-consuming and required considerable preparation to facilitate input from the target population. Small groups, gathering at convenient local locations, with transport support were essential in removing barriers to participation. However, co-creation was a viable method of eliciting the women's preferences and developing services more likely to meet their needs.Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)en
dc.relation.ispartofHealth & Social Care in the Community-
dc.subject.meshpsychology-
dc.subject.meshaged-
dc.subject.meshAustralia-
dc.subject.meshcooperation-
dc.subject.meshhealth services research-
dc.subject.meshorganization and management-
dc.subject.meshsocial isolation-
dc.subject.meshsocial support-
dc.subject.meshsocial work-
dc.subject.meshadvocacy group-
dc.subject.meshAustralia-
dc.subject.meshconsultation-
dc.subject.meshlearning-
dc.subject.meshparticipatory action research-
dc.subject.meshwellbeing-
dc.titleCo-creation of services to maintain independence and optimise well-being: Learnings from Australia's Older Women Living Alone (OWLA) project.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.affiliationMental Health-
dc.type.studyortrialSystematic review and/or meta-analysis-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12882-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
dc.identifier.pubmedid31663214 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=31663214]en
dc.identifier.source629724839en
dc.identifier.institution(Ogrin, Dickins, Johnstone, Lowthian) Bolton Clarke Research Institute, Vic, Australia (Ogrin) Department of International Business and Asian Studies, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia (Ogrin) Biosignals for Affordable Healthcare, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (Ogrin) Austin Health Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Vic., Australia (Dickins) Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry at Monash Health, Southern Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (Mortimer, Iezzi) Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia (Lowthian) School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (Lowthian) Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia (Lowthian) Institute of Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australiaen
dc.rights.statementThis record is sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicineen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Feb 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.