Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27568
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTsaltas J.en
dc.contributor.authorChan K.-W.en
dc.contributor.authorPolyakov A.en
dc.contributor.authorEdwards G.N.en
dc.contributor.authorNajjar H.en
dc.contributor.authorVollenhoven B.en
dc.contributor.authorFitz-Gerald A.L.en
dc.contributor.authorTan J.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:16:58Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:16:58Zen
dc.date.copyright2013en
dc.date.created20131112en
dc.date.issued2013-11-12en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 20 (6) (pp 853-857), 2013. Date of Publication: 2013.en
dc.identifier.issn1553-4650en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27568en
dc.description.abstractStudy Objective: To compare operating time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative analgesia, and length of hospital stay using ultrasonic shears vs traditional suture ligature in vaginal hysterectomy. Design(s): Randomized controlled trial (Canadian Task Force classification I). Setting(s): Gynecology units within a single health network, university hospital. Patient(s): Forty women requiring vaginal hysterectomy because of benign disease. Intervention(s): Vaginal hysterectomy performed using either ultrasonically activated shears (USS) or traditional suture ligatures. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty-one patients were randomized to the USS arm, and 19 patients to the traditional suture ligature arm. Patient characteristics were comparable. Mean (SD) hysterectomy time and was similar in both the USS and traditional arms, 28.66 (4.0) minutes vs 32.37 (3.18) minutes (p=.47), as was total operating time, 97.38 (8.9) minutes vs 91.63 (7.69) minutes (p=.63). Operative blood loss was significantly decreased in the USS group: 62.63 (12.46) mL vs 136.05 (21.54) mL (p=.006). There was, however, no significant change in hemoglobin concentration between the 2 groups: 19.53 (1.79) g/L vs -16.72 (2.5) g/L. There was no significant difference in mean oxycodone use: 9.29 (2.66) mg vs 8.06(3.19) mg (p=.77). Length of hospital stay was similar in both groups: 58.98 (3.27) hours vs 60.05 (6.48) hours (p=.88). There was no significant difference in overall complication rates between the groups. Conclusion(s): Although the Harmonic scalpel system, compared with the traditional suture ligation method, seems to be a safe alternative for securing the pedicles in vaginal hysterectomy, it offers no benefit insofar as operative time, reduction in clinically significant blood loss, and analgesic requirements. © 2013 AAGL.en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier (P.O. Box 211, Amsterdam 1000 AE, Netherlands)en
dc.titleComparison of ultrasonic shears and traditional suture ligature for vaginal hysterectomy: Randomized controlled trial.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.studyortrialRandomised controlled trial-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.019en
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen
dc.identifier.pubmedid24183277 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=24183277]en
dc.identifier.source370171776en
dc.identifier.institution(Fitz-Gerald, Vollenhoven) Monash Medical Center/Southern Health Clayton, Australia (Tan) Hollywood Medical Center, Nedlands, Australia (Chan, Edwards, Najjar, Tsaltas) Monash Medical Centre/Southern Health Moorabbin, Australia (Polyakov) Melbourne IVF East Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.description.addressA.L. Fitz-Gerald, Gynaecology Services, Southern Health, Level 5, 246 Clayton Rd, Clayton, VIC, Australia. E-mail: fitzali@gmail.comen
dc.description.publicationstatusEmbaseen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.subect.keywordsUltrasonic shears Vaginal hysterectomyen
dc.identifier.authoremailFitz-Gerald A.L.; fitzali@gmail.comen
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
crisitem.author.deptObstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Sep 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.