Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27635
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMirbagheri N.en
dc.contributor.authorSkinner S.en
dc.contributor.authorDark J.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:18:23Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:18:23Zen
dc.date.copyright2013en
dc.date.created20140212en
dc.date.issued2014-02-12en
dc.identifier.citationTechniques in Coloproctology. 17 (2) (pp 215-220), 2013. Date of Publication: 2013.en
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/27635en
dc.description.abstractBackground Stoma closure is associated with high wound infection rates. The aim of this study was to evaluate risk factors for infection rates in such wounds, with particular emphasis on assessing the importance of the stomal wound closure technique. Methods A retrospective analysis of 142 patients who had undergone ileostomy or colostomy closure between 2002 and 2011 was performed. Postoperative outcome as measured by wound infection rate was recorded. Three different closure techniques were identified: primary closure (PC), primary closure with Penrose drain (PCP) and purse-string circumferential wound approximation technique (PSC). Other factors such as age, sex, ASA score, type of prophylactic antibiotics used, diabetes, smoking and obesity were also analysed. All other techniques were excluded. Results Our series consisted of 142 stomal closures (90 ileostomy and 52 colostomy closures). The patients had a median age of 63.5 years with an interquartile range of 50.1-73.2 years. The overall wound infection rate was 10.7 %. PC, PCP and PSC were associated with wound infection rates of 17.9, 10.5 and 3.6 %, respectively. Compared to PSC, PC and PCP were associated with significantly higher wound infection rates (p = 0.027 and p = 0.068, respectively). Obesity was a significant risk factor for wound infection (p = 0.024). Use of triple-agent antibiotics prophylactically had a protective effect on the infection rate (p = 0.012). Conclusions To reduce stomal wound closure infection rates, we recommend institution of closure techniques other than PC with or without a drain. Risk factors such as obesity should be addressed, and prophylactic triple antibiotics should be administered. © Springer-Verlag Italia 2012.en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherSpringer Milan (Via Podgora 4, Milan I-20122, Italy)en
dc.titleFactors predicting stomal wound closure infection rates.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10151-012-0908-4en
dc.publisher.placeItalyen
dc.identifier.pubmedid23076288 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23076288]en
dc.identifier.source52262144en
dc.identifier.institution(Mirbagheri) Department of Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australia (Dark) Academic Surgical Unit, Dandenong Hospital, P.O. Box 478, Dandenong, VIC 3175, Australia (Skinner) Department of Finance, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen
dc.description.addressDepartment of Surgery, Frankston Hospital, Hastings Road, Frankston, VIC, Australiaen
dc.description.publicationstatusEmbaseen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2014 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.subect.keywordsStoma Surgical site wound infection Surgical techniqueen
dc.identifier.authoremailMirbagheri N.; naseem.mirbagheri@southernhealth.org.auen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Sep 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.