Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28506
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcinnes E.en
dc.contributor.authorLightbody C.E.en
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton S.en
dc.contributor.authorWatkins D.C.en
dc.contributor.authorPatel T.en
dc.contributor.authorMiller C.en
dc.contributor.authorJones S.en
dc.contributor.authorBangee M.en
dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Garduno C.en
dc.contributor.authorBrady M.en
dc.contributor.authorCadilhac D.en
dc.contributor.authorDale S.en
dc.contributor.authorHurley M.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T09:36:02Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T09:36:02Zen
dc.date.copyright2020en
dc.date.created20210131en
dc.date.issued2021-02-01en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Stroke. Conference: 12th World Stroke Congress 2020. Vienna Austria. 15 (1 SUPPL) (pp 357), 2020. Date of Publication: 2020.en
dc.identifier.issn1747-4949en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28506en
dc.description.abstractBackground And Aims: Dehydration and malnutrition are common in hospitalised stroke patients and are associated with poor outcomes including mortality. This study aimed to capture how nutrition and hydration is currently assessed and managed in the UK and Australia (AUS). Method(s): Cross-sectional survey of 337 hospitals (April to November 2019) providing inpatient care for stroke patients (UK N=174; AUS N=163). Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Result(s): 270 respondents (UK N=150 86%; AUS N=120 74%) from a range of clinical settings (121 acute stroke unit; 19 stroke ward; 63 integrated acute and rehabilitation; 56 rehabilitation; 11 other). Nutritional status was most likely to be assessed on admission (UK 79%; AUS 84%) by a Nurse (UK 97%; AUS 83%) or Dietician (UK 70%; AUS 85%). In the UK, 90% utilised the Malnutrition Universal Tool (MUST), compared with 50% in AUS. Management decisions regarding calorie-intake were the realm of Dieticians (UK 98%; AUS 97%). Hydration assessment was undertaken by Nurses (UK 87%; AUS 79%) or Doctors (UK 81%; AUS 88%) on admission (UK 62%; AUS 58%) and repeated daily (UK 65%; AUS 61%) using a combination of visual assessment (UK 65%; AUS 61%) and clinical tests (Urine Specific Gravity UK 22%; AUS 46%; Urea:creatinine UK 3%; AUS 20%). Hydration management decisions were primarily made by physicians (UK 84%; AUS 83%). Conclusion(s): Nutrition and hydration practices are broadly similar in the UK and AUS, with Nurses taking responsibility for assessment and monitoring, while Dieticians and Physicians undertake decisionmaking regarding management. The survey findings will inform further research and education.en
dc.languageenen
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Inc.en
dc.titleNutrition and hydration practices in acute stroke care: An international cross-sectional survey.en
dc.typeConference Abstracten
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747493020963387en
local.date.conferencestart2020-05-12en
dc.identifier.source634005556en
dc.identifier.institution(Miller, Jones, Bangee, Hurley, Lightbody, Patel) University of Central Lancashire, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Preston, United Kingdom (Martinez-Garduno) Australian Catholic University, Nursing Research Institute, Australia (Brady) Glasgow Caledonian University, Nmahp Research Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom (Cadilhac) Monash University,Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences At Monash Health, Australia (Dale) Australian Catholic University, St Vincents Health (Sydney), Nursing Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia (Mcinnes, Middleton) Australian Catholic University, St Vincent's Health Australia Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia (Watkins) University of Central Lancashire, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, United Kingdomen
dc.description.addressC. Miller, University of Central Lancashire, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Preston, United Kingdomen
dc.description.publicationstatusCONFERENCE ABSTRACTen
local.date.conferenceend2020-05-15en
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Miller, Jones, Bangee, Hurley, Lightbody, Patel) University of Central Lancashire, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, Preston, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Martinez-Garduno) Australian Catholic University, Nursing Research Institute, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Brady) Glasgow Caledonian University, Nmahp Research Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Dale) Australian Catholic University, St Vincents Health (Sydney), Nursing Research Institute, Darlinghurst, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Mcinnes, Middleton) Australian Catholic University, St Vincent's Health Australia Sydney, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Watkins) University of Central Lancashire, Faculty of Health and Wellbeing, United Kingdom-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Cadilhac) Monash University,Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences At Monash Health, Australia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeConference Abstract-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
Appears in Collections:Conferences
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Sep 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.