Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28669
Title: | A randomised controlled trial to assess the feasibility of utilising virtual reality to facilitate analgesia during external cephalic version. | Authors: | Wallace E.M. ;Warty R.R.;Kashyap R.;Neil P.;Smith V.;Adriaans C.;Nair A.;Krishnan S.;Da Silva Costa F.;Vollenhoven B. | Monash Health Department(s): | Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's) | Institution: | (Smith, Warty, Da Silva Costa, Vollenhoven, Wallace) Ritchie Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, 252 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia (Smith, Warty, Nair) Unit #03-53, Block 81 ,Ayer Rajah Crescent, Singapore (Smith) 3B Teo Hong Road, Singapore (Kashyap, Neil, Adriaans, Vollenhoven) Monash Women's, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health252 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia (Krishnan) West Gippsland Health Service, Warragul, VIC 3820, Australia (Da Silva Costa) Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil | Issue Date: | 15-Jan-2021 | Copyright year: | 2020 | Publisher: | NLM (Medline) | Place of publication: | United Kingdom | Publication information: | Scientific reports. 10 (1) (pp 3141), 2020. Date of Publication: 21 Feb 2020. | Journal: | Scientific Reports | Abstract: | External cephalic version (ECV) is associated with a moderate degree of pain. Virtual reality (VR) is a technology that has shown promise in offering procedural analgesia. We undertook a clinical pilot to assess the viability of VR to reduce pain during ECV. In an open randomised controlled trial (RCT), we randomised 50 women to either VR or standard care each (25 per group). Women receiving VR were administered VR content (Skylights) via a headset. Pre- and post-procedural measures of pain, anxiety, device experience and vital signs were measured. There were no significant differences between groups (VR/no VR) in pain scores (60.68 vs 49.76; p=0.2), ECV success rates (80% vs 76%; p=0.7) or anxiety levels. The women receiving VR had a significantly higher anticipation of pain pre-procedurally (70.0 vs 50.0; p=0.03). 20 (80%) of the VR women indicated that they would use VR again and 22 (88%) indicated they would recommend it to a friend having ECV. There were no significant differences between groups for side effects encountered or changes in vital signs. We have shown that using VR during ECV is feasible and appears safe. Our results inform the design of future RCTs. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url= http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60040-3 |
PubMed URL: | 32081989 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=32081989] | ISSN: | 2045-2322 (electronic) | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28669 | Type: | Article | Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Randomised controlled trial |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.