Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/29177
Title: | Early home-based pulmonary rehabilitation following acute exacerbation of COPD: A feasibility study using an action research approach. | Authors: | Holland A.E.;Wageck B.;Cox N.S.;Bondarenko J.;Corbett M.;Nichols A.;Moore R. | Monash Health Department(s): | Physiotherapy | Institution: | (Wageck, Cox, Holland) Discipline of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (Cox, Moore, Holland) Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia (Cox, Nichols, Holland) Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Bondarenko, Corbett, Holland) Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Nichols) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia | Issue Date: | 29-Aug-2020 | Copyright year: | 2020 | Publisher: | SAGE Publications Ltd (E-mail: info@sagepub.co.uk) | Place of publication: | United Kingdom | Publication information: | Chronic Respiratory Disease. 17 (no pagination), 2020. Date of Publication: 2020. | Journal: | Chronic Respiratory Disease | Abstract: | Objective: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves function, reduces symptoms and decreases healthcare usage in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) following an acute exacerbation (AECOPD). However, rehabilitation uptake rates are low. This study aimed to address barriers to uptake and completion of PR following AECOPD. Method(s): An action research approach was used to reflect on study feasibility, and to plan and implement an improved protocol. Phase I tested the feasibility of home-based PR started early after AECOPD. Phase II used qualitative interviews to identified potential barriers to program uptake. Phase III re-tested the program with changes to recruitment and assessment strategies. Result(s): Phase I: From 97 screened patients, 26 were eligible and 10 (38%) started home-based PR. Eight participants undertook >=70% of PR sessions, achieving clinically meaningful improvement in 6-minute walk distance (mean (SD) change 76 (60) m) and chronic respiratory disease questionnaire total score (15 (21) units). Phase II: Potential barriers to uptake of home-based PR included access issues, confidence to exercise, and lack of information about PR benefits. Phase III: From 77 screened patients, 23 were eligible and 5 (22%) started the program. Discussion(s): Home-based PR improved clinical outcomes, but program eligibility and uptake remain challenging. Efforts should be made to ensure PR program eligibility criteria are broad enough to accommodate patient needs, and new ways of engaging patients are needed to improve PR uptake after AECOPD.Copyright © The Author(s) 2020. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1479973120949207 | PubMed URL: | 32815732 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=32815732] | ISSN: | 1479-9723 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/29177 | Type: | Article | Subjects: | six minute walk test acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/rh [Rehabilitation] action research aged chronic obstructive lung disease/rh [Rehabilitation] exercise health care access home rehabilitation information literacy motivation patient compliance pilot study pulmonary rehabilitation |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Qualitative study |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.