Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31044
Title: Neuroleptic Dose in the Management of Delirium in Patients with Advanced Cancer.
Authors: Bruera E.;Hui D.;Bush S.H.;Gallo L.E.;Palmer J.L.;Yennurajalingam S.
Institution: (Hui, Bush, Gallo, Palmer, Yennurajalingam, Bruera) Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States (Bush) McCulloch House, Southern Health Care Network, Melbourne, Vic., Australia (Bush) Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia
Issue Date: 11-Oct-2012
Copyright year: 2010
Publisher: Elsevier Inc. (360 Park Avenue South, New York NY 10010, United States)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 39 (2) (pp 186-196), 2010. Date of Publication: February 2010.
Abstract: Neuroleptics are commonly used in the management of delirium. Limited information is available regarding the dosage requirements and efficacy of neuroleptics in the palliative care setting. We determined the type and dose of neuroleptic use by delirium subtype. The medical records of 99 inpatients with advanced cancer were reviewed retrospectively. The doses of different neuroleptics, expressed as haloperidol equivalent daily doses (HEDDs), were correlated with delirium recall, recalled delirium symptom frequency, and associated distress from the patients', family caregivers', nurses' and palliative care specialists' perspectives. Subtypes of delirium included hypoactive in 20 (20%), mixed in 66 (67%), and hyperactive in 13 (13%). The median HEDD was 2.5 mg, interquartile range (Q1-Q3) 1-4.7 mg (mean 4.0 +/- 5.9 mg), and it was significantly higher in agitated and mixed delirium as compared with hypoactive delirium (P = 0.008). The neuroleptic dose was low and appeared to be ineffective in preventing patient delirium recall, with 73 (74%) patients remembering their episode of delirium as distressing. HEDD did not correlate with delirium recall, recalled symptom frequency, or distress for patients and family caregivers. However, HEDD increased with nurses' distress related to patients' symptoms (disorientation to place P = 0.002, disorientation to time P = 0.008, delusions P = 0.041, and agitation P < 0.001), and palliative care specialists' distress related to patients' hallucinatory symptoms (P = 0.006) and agitation (P = 0.006). In this study, the administered neuroleptic dose was influenced more by health care professional distress than by delirium symptom frequency. Future studies should examine the efficacy of neuroleptic dose according to individual delirium symptoms. © 2010 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.009
PubMed URL: 20152585 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20152585]
ISSN: 0885-3924
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31044
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Feb 11, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.