Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31067
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorO'Dea K.en
dc.contributor.authorShaw J.E.en
dc.contributor.authorLu Z.X.en
dc.contributor.authorWalker K.Z.en
dc.contributor.authorSikaris K.A.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T10:30:30Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T10:30:30Zen
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.created20100621en
dc.date.issued2012-10-11en
dc.identifier.citationDiabetes Care. 33 (4) (pp 817-819), 2010. Date of Publication: April 2010.en
dc.identifier.issn0149-5992en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/31067en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE - To evaluate A1C for screening and diagnosis of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes defined by oral glucose tolerance testing in clinical and general populations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - A1C cut offs (<=5.5% to rule out diabetes; >=7.0% to rule in diabetes) were derived from a clinical group (Melbourne Pathology [MP] group: n = 2,494; undiagnosed diabetes 34.6%) and then evaluated in a population-based sample (AusDiab group: n = 6,015; undiagnosed diabetes 4.6%). RESULTS - For diabetes in the MP and AusDiab groups, A1C at 5.5% gave sensitivities of 98.7 and 83.5%, while A1C at 7.0% gave specificities of 98.2 and 100%, respectively. Many (61.9-69.3%) with impaired A1C (5.6-6.9%) in both populations had abnormal glucose status. CONCLUSIONS - A1C <=5.5% and >=7.0% predicts absence or presence of type 2 diabetes, respectively, while at A1C 6.5-6.9% diabetes is highly probable in clinical and population settings. A high proportion of people with impaired A1C have abnormal glucose status requiring follow-up. © 2010 by the American Diabetes Association.en
dc.languageenen
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.publisherAmerican Diabetes Association Inc. (1701 North Beauregard St., Alexandria VA 22311, United States)en
dc.titleA1C for screening and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc09-1763en
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen
dc.identifier.pubmedid20067965 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=20067965]en
dc.identifier.source358932477en
dc.identifier.institution(Lu, Sikaris) Melbourne Pathology Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Lu) Department of Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Walker) Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Walker) Preventative Health Unit, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (O'Dea) Sansom Institute for Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia (Shaw) Clinical Diabetes and Epidemiology Unit, Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australiaen
dc.description.addressZ. X. Lu, Melbourne Pathology Services, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. E-mail: zhong.lu@mps.com.auen
dc.description.publicationstatusEmbaseen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.identifier.authoremailLu Z.X.; zhong.lu@mps.com.auen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

2
checked on Sep 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.