Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/32264
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung Y.en
dc.contributor.authorMccartney A.J.en
dc.contributor.authorHammond I.G.en
dc.contributor.authorObermair A.en
dc.contributor.authorManolitsas T.P.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T10:55:41Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T10:55:41Zen
dc.date.copyright2005en
dc.date.created20050418en
dc.date.issued2012-10-17en
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 15 (2) (pp 319-324), 2005. Date of Publication: March/April 2005.en
dc.identifier.issn1048-891Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/32264en
dc.description.abstractObesity is common in endometrial cancer and surgery for these patients is challenging. We compared total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) with respect to feasibility (operating time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and conversion to laparotomy) and safety (perioperative morbidity and mortality) in a retrospective analysis of 78 morbidly obese patients with endometrial cancer. Analysis is based on the intention to treat. The intention to treat was TLH in 47 patients and it could be successfully completed in 42 patients (89.4%). The mean weight for all patients was 118.7 kg, with patients in the TLH group weighing more and having higher ASA scores. Mean operating time and estimated blood loss were similar in both groups. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 4.4 (+/-3.9) days in the TLH group and 7.9 (+/-3.0) days in the TAH group (P < 0.0001). Wound infections occurred in 15 of 31 patients (48.4%) in the TAH group and in 1 of 47 patients (2.1%) in the TLH group. All other morbidity, as well as patterns of recurrence and survival were similar in both groups. These data justify a prospective randomized trial comparing TLH with TAH for the treatment of endometrial cancer. © 2005 IGCS.en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkins (530 Walnut Street,P O Box 327, Philadelphia PA 19106-3621, United States)en
dc.titleTotal laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.type.studyortrialRandomised controlled trial-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.15223.xen
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen
dc.identifier.pubmedid15823119 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=15823119]en
dc.identifier.source40396972en
dc.identifier.institution(Obermair, Leung, Hammond, Mccartney) Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, QLD, Australia (Manolitsas) Monash Medical Centre, East Bentleigh, Vic., Australia (Leung) St. John of God Hospital Murdoch, Murdoch, WA, Australia (Hammond, Mccartney) St. John of God Hospital Subiaco, Subiaco, WA, Australia (Obermair) Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australiaen
dc.description.addressA. Obermair, Ned Hanlon Building, Royal Women's Hospital, Herston, QLD 4029, Australia. E-mail: andreas_obermair@health.qld.gov.auen
dc.description.publicationstatusEmbaseen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.subect.keywordsEndometrial cancer Feasibility Laparoscopy Obesity Prognosis Safetyen
dc.identifier.authoremailObermair A.; andreas_obermair@health.qld.gov.auen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Feb 6, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.