Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/33202
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrumley D.en
dc.contributor.authorHayes B.en
dc.contributor.authorJackson K.en
dc.contributor.authorAshby M.en
dc.contributor.authorMartin P.en
dc.contributor.authorPisasale M.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T11:15:36Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T11:15:36Zen
dc.date.copyright2001en
dc.date.created20011003en
dc.date.issued2012-10-23en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Pain and Symptom Management. 22 (4) (pp 834-842), 2001. Date of Publication: 2001.en
dc.identifier.issn0885-3924en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/33202en
dc.description.abstractThe results of a novel approach to the use of ketamine in refractory cancer pain are reported. In this prospective, multicenter, unblinded, open-label audit, 39 patients (with a total of 43 pains) received a short duration (3 to 5 days) ketamine infusion. The initial dose of 100 mg/24 hr was escalated if required to 300 mg/24 hr and then to a maximum dose of 500 mg/24hr. The overall response rate was 29/43 (67%). Analysis of results according to pain mechanisms showed that 15/17 somatic and 14/23 neuropathic pains responded. In 5 patients who appeared to respond, it is possible that another concurrent intervention may have contributed in whole or part for the pain relief observed. After cessation of ketamine, 24/29 maintained good pain control, with a maximum documented duration of eight weeks. However, 5 of the initial 29 responders experienced a recurrence of pain within 24 hours, and ketamine was recommenced. Of these, 2 underwent another intervention for pain control while 3 continued on ketamine until their deaths between two and four weeks later. Twelve patients reported adverse psychomimetic effects, with the incidence rising with increasing dose. Four of these were non-responders and the ketamine was stopped. Eight were responders, and in 3 the adverse effects were rendered acceptable with dose reduction; the other 5 rejected a dose reduction. The results reported suggest the need for further investigation of the place of ketamine in cancer pain management. Copyright © 2001 .en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. (360 Park Avenue South, New York NY 10010, United States)en
dc.title'Burst' ketamine for refractory cancer pain: An open-label audit of 39 patients.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0885-3924%2801%2900340-2en
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen
dc.identifier.pubmedid11576800 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=11576800]en
dc.identifier.source32884376en
dc.identifier.institution(Jackson, Ashby, Martin) Monash Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, Vic., Australia (Pisasale) Mercy Hospice Inc., Sunshine, Vic., Australia (Brumley) Gandarra Palliative Care Unit, Ballarat, Vic., Australia (Hayes) Melbourne Extended Care and Rehabilitation Service, Parkville, Vic., Australia (Jackson) McCulloch House, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australiaen
dc.description.addressK. Jackson, McCulloch House, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Parkville, Vic. 3168, Australiaen
dc.description.publicationstatusEmbaseen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2012 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.subect.keywordsAnalgesic audit Analgesics Cancer pain Ketamine Neuropathic Pain Palliative care Somaticen
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Feb 6, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.