Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/33460
Title: | Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: A systematic review. | Authors: | Mcdonald M.;Forbes A.;Marshall C.;Grabsch E. | Monash Health Department(s): | Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology | Institution: | (Mcdonald) Infectious Diseases Service, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Vic., Australia (Grabsch) Dept. Infect. Dis. Clin. Epidemiol., Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Vic., Australia (Marshall) Dept. of Microbiol. and Infect. Dis., Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia (Forbes) Dept. Epidemiol. Preventative Med., Monash University, Alfred Hospital Campus, Prahran, Vic., Australia (Mcdonald) 68 Myers Street, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia | Issue Date: | 20-Jul-1998 | Copyright year: | 1998 | Publisher: | Blackwell Publishing | Place of publication: | Australia | Publication information: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 68 (6) (pp 388-395), 1998. Date of Publication: 1998. | Journal: | Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery | Abstract: | Background: Single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is a widely accepted principle; recommendations have been based on laboratory studies and numerous clinical trials published in the last 25 years. In practice, single-dose prophylaxis has not been universally accepted and multiple-dose regimens are still used in some centres. Moreover, the principle has recently been challenged by the results of an Australian study of vascular surgery. The aim of this current systematic review is to determine the overall efficacy of single versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery and across surgical disciplines. Method(s): Relevant studies were identified in the medical literature using the MEDLINE database and other search strategies. Trials included in the review were prospective and randomized, had the same antimicrobial in each treatment arm and were published in English. Rates of postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) were extracted, 2 x 2 tables prepared and odds ratios (OR) [With 95% confidence intervals (95% CI)] calculated. Data were then combined using fixed and random effects models to provide an overall figure. In this context, a high value for the combined OR, with 95% CI > 1.0, indicates superiority of multiple-dose regimens and a low OR, with 95% CI < 1.0, suggests the opposite. A combined OR close to 1.0, with narrow 95% CI straddling 1.0, indicates no clear advantage of one regimen over another. Further subgroup analyses were also performed. Result(s): Combined OR by both fixed (1.06, 95% CI, 0.89-1.25) and random effects (1.04, 95% CI, 0.86-1.25) models indicated no clear advantage of either single or multiple-dose regimens in preventing SSI. Likewise, subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences associated with type of antimicrobial used (beta-lactam vs other), blinded wound assessment, length of the multiple-dose arm (> 24 h vs 24 h or less) or type of surgery (obstetric and gynecological vs other). Conclusion(s): Continued use of single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery is recommended. Further studies are required, especially in previously neglected surgical disciplines. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1998.tb04785.x | PubMed URL: | 9623456 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=9623456] | ISSN: | 0004-8682 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/33460 | Type: | Review | Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Review article (e.g. literature review, narrative review) |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.