Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/34827
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotti M.en
dc.contributor.authorRedley B.en
dc.contributor.authorDouglas T.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T11:45:34Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T11:45:34Zen
dc.date.copyright2020en
dc.date.created20200728en
dc.date.issued2020-07-28en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of clinical nursing. 29 (9-10) (pp 1477-1487), 2020. Date of Publication: 01 May 2020.en
dc.identifier.issn1365-2702 (electronic)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/34827en
dc.description.abstractAIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To systematically locate, assess and synthesise research to describe methods used to examine technology in relation to the quality of nursing work in acute care. Specific objectives were to (a) describe the types of nursing work examined; (b) describe methods used to examine technology in nursing work; (c) identify outcomes used to evaluate technology in relation to the quality of nursing work; and (d) make recommendations for future research. BACKGROUND: New technologies can offer numerous benefits to nurses; however, it is challenging to evaluate health information technologies in relation to the quality of nurses' complex day-to-day work. DESIGN: A systematic integrative review using a five-step process. METHOD(S): Five databases were searched using search terms "nurs*," "workload," "task," "time." Data screening, extraction and interpretation were conducted independently by at least two authors and agreement verified by discussion. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines. RESULT(S): Of the 41 studies included, most (87.8%, n = 36) examined physical dimensions of nursing work; 31.7% (n = 13) organisational dimensions; 17.1% (n = 8) cognitive dimensions; and only 12.2% (n = 5) emotional dimensions. More than half (58.5%, n = 24) examined only one dimension; one captured all four dimensions. Most frequently examined technologies were electronic medical/health records (36.5%) and electronic medication management (19.5%). Direct observation (58.8%, n = 28) and multiple methods (19.5%, n = 8) were the most common methods; nurse tasks, frequency, duration and time distribution were variables most often measured. CONCLUSION(S): Examinations of technology in nursing work often failed to capture the multiple dimensions of this work nor did they recognise the complexity of day-to-day nursing work in acute care. There is a paucity of literature to inform how and what technology should be measured in relation to the quality of nursing care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The outcomes inform useful research methods to comprehensively examine technology to enhance the quality of complex nursing work.Copyright © 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.languageenen
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Nursing-
dc.subject.meshhealth care quality-
dc.subject.meshhospital organization-
dc.subject.meshintensive care nursing-
dc.subject.meshtechnology-
dc.subject.meshworkload-
dc.subject.meshnursing staff-
dc.subject.meshelectronic health record-
dc.titleMethods used to examine technology in relation to the quality of nursing work in acute care: A systematic integrative review.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin University - Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Monash Health partnership-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15213-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
dc.identifier.pubmedid32045059 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=32045059]en
dc.identifier.source630892223en
dc.identifier.institution(Redley) Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Monash Health Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia (Douglas) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australia (Botti) Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research - Epworth Healthcare Partnership, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Burwood, Vic., Australiaen
dc.rights.statementThis record is sourced from MEDLINE/PubMed, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicineen
dc.subect.keywordsintegrative review methods nursing quality of care technologyen
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDeakin University - Monash Health Nursing Research Centre-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Jan 9, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.