Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/35110
Conference/Presentation Title: | HP-4-3 Radical Prostatectomy Survivorship - What Are We Really Asking? AN Audit of Sexual, Urinary and Bowel Dysfunction Outcome Discussions. | Authors: | Stokes D.;Yim A.;Silagy B.;Slade K.;Blecher G.;Ong X.R.;Merrett C. | Institution: | (Ong, Merrett, Blecher) Monash Health, Clayton, Australia (Ong, Yim, Silagy, Stokes) Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia (Ong) Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Slade) Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia | Presentation/Conference Date: | 17-Jun-2020 | Copyright year: | 2020 | Publisher: | Elsevier B.V. | Publication information: | Journal of Sexual Medicine. Conference: 22st Congress of the European Society for Sexual Medicine: PS-1 Psychosexual gender and sexology. Prague Czechia. 17 (6 Supplement 2) (pp S161), 2020. Date of Publication: June 2020. | Journal: | Journal of Sexual Medicine | Abstract: | Objectives: Erectile dysfunction (ED), urinary incontinence and bowel dysfunction are all recognized complications post radical prostatectomy and have a significant effect upon the quality of life and psychological well-being of patients. We aimed to quantify how we are performing at identifying and addressing these complications both pre and post-operatively. Method(s): A retrospective audit was conducted on all patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy across two tertiary health services in Victoria, Monash Health and Alfred Health, over a five-year period (2014-2018). A systematic record review of outpatient notes and letters focused on whether survivorship outcomes were discussed: pre-operatively and thereafter at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post procedure. The seniority and type of the clinician was recorded at all time points. Ethics board approval was obtained locally at both sites. Result(s): A total of 259 patients underwent open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Pre-operatively there was documentation of discussion of ED in 85% (n=208) of patients, revealing 21% (n=45) to have pre-existing ED. Post-operatively at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months, ED was discussed and documented in 50%, 59%, 64% and 64% (n=118,110,125,105) of clinical interactions. Pharmacological or mechanical therapies were offered to 36%, 43% and 44% (n=54,72,61) of men who reported ED at 3 months, 6 months, 12 months respectively whilst 43%, 38% and 38% (n=47,45,35) declined treatment. By 12 months 1% (n=3) of patients had opted for surgical management with a penile prosthesis. Between 3 and 6 months post-operatively discussions about urinary incontinence increased from 88% to 97% (n=168,195). Bowel dysfunction was discussed with only 2% (n=5) of patients. Conclusion(s): ED and urinary incontinence post radical prostatectomy are common complications. Our results suggest that their identification has been incompletely addressed. Ideally all relevant patients should have counselling regarding survivorship issues pre and post-operatively.Copyright © 2020 | Conference Start Date: | 2020-01-23 | Conference End Date: | 2020-01-25 | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.04.127 | ISSN: | 1743-6095 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/35110 | Type: | Conference Abstract | Subjects: | erectile dysfunction ethics intestine medical record outpatient penis prosthesis prostatectomy surgery survivorship urine incontinence counseling documentation |
Appears in Collections: | Conferences |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.