Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/38930
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCameron J.en
dc.contributor.authorNasis A.en
dc.contributor.authorChoy K.en
dc.contributor.authorMirzaee S.en
dc.contributor.authorDoery J.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T13:17:36Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T13:17:36Zen
dc.date.copyright2017en
dc.date.created20180317en
dc.date.issued2018-03-19en
dc.identifier.citationHeart Lung and Circulation. Conference: 65th Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting and the International Society for Heart Research Australasian Section Annual Scientific Meeting. Perth, WA Australia. 26 (Supplement 2) (pp S122-S123), 2017. Date of Publication: 2017.en
dc.identifier.issn1444-2892en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/38930en
dc.description.abstractBackground: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common hereditary lipid disorder associated with high risk of cardiovascular disease. Emerging evidence suggests, FH is often both underdiagnosed and undertreated by health care providers. The prevalence of identified FH in a tertiary laboratory was assessed in this study. Method(s): We reviewed serum LDL-C level measured by a tertiary laboratory in Melbourne Australia over a six months period (July to December 2016). The prevalence of possible FHbasedonrecommendedLDL-Cthresholdsof5mmol/Las employed by the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score was evaluated. Result(s): 4943 individuals had serum LDL-C assessment within this period, 106 patients; male/female ratio of 46/60 and mean age of 56, had LDL cholesterol of >= 5mmol/L after exclusion of five patients (0.1%) with secondary causes. Despite a poor documentation of family history and physical examination, 1.8% had DLCNS of 3-5, 0.3% a score of 6-8 and 0.1% a score of >8 indicating a possible, probable and definite diagnosis of FH respectively. The cumulative prevalence of likely phenotypical FH based on an LDL-C >=5.0mmol/L was 2.1% (1: 50). General practitioners referred 37.1% of the total patients followed by cardiologists and endocrinologists equally 12.2% and remaining 38.5% by other specialists. Conclusion(s): This study highlights the potential role of a tertiary laboratory in an opportunistic screening for index cases of FH. These data support the benefit of establishing an efficient "alert system" along with a trigger "reflex testing" to facilitate screening and ensuring further referral to a lipid disorder specialist.en
dc.languageenen
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.publisherElsevier Ltden
dc.titleThe place of a tertiary laboratory in an opportunistic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia.en
dc.typeConference Abstracten
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2017.06.184en
local.date.conferencestart2017-08-10en
dc.identifier.source621232693en
dc.identifier.institution(Mirzaee, Choy, Doery, Nasis, Cameron) Monash Heart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.description.addressS. Mirzaee, Monash Heart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.description.publicationstatusCONFERENCE ABSTRACTen
local.date.conferenceend2017-08-13en
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.en
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Mirzaee, Choy, Doery, Nasis, Cameron) Monash Heart, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeConference Abstract-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology (MonashHeart & Victorian Heart Institute)-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology (MonashHeart & Victorian Heart Institute)-
crisitem.author.deptPathology-
Appears in Collections:Conferences
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

22
checked on Sep 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.