Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/41569
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPogrebnoy D.en
dc.contributor.authorMcGinley J.en
dc.contributor.authorKravtsov S.en
dc.contributor.authorMorgan P.en
dc.contributor.authorMurphy A.en
dc.contributor.authorOpheim A.en
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-14T14:14:45Zen
dc.date.available2021-05-14T14:14:45Zen
dc.date.copyright2015en
dc.date.created20160701en
dc.date.issued2016-07-01en
dc.identifier.citationClinical rehabilitation. 29 (9) (pp 907-919), 2015. Date of Publication: 01 Sep 2015.en
dc.identifier.issn1477-0873 (electronic)en
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/41569en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, feasibility and potential efficacy of balance training in adults with cerebral palsy. DESIGN: Phase 2, assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation facility. SUBJECTS: A total of 17 ambulatory adults with cerebral palsy. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomly allocated to an eight-week, once-weekly, small group programme of balance training, or seated attention control activity. Balance training was individually tailored using the Balance Evaluation Systems test. MAIN MEASURES: Primary focus was feasibility, addressed by recruitment, retention, adherence, and safety. Efficacy was primarily evaluated with the Ambulatory Self-Confidence Questionnaire and the Balance Evaluation Systems test, at intervention conclusion and Week 24. Secondary outcomes included gait speed, walking distance, falls efficacy, fatigue, quality of life, and global impression of change. RESULTS: Interventions were safe and feasible with no major adverse events. Adherence was high. At eight and 24 weeks, there were negligible between-group differences in Balance Evaluation systems test total. At 24 weeks, there was a small, non-significant between-group difference in favour of the balance group with effect sizes of 0.14 for ambulatory self-confidence, 0.10 for falls efficacy, and 0.12 for fatigue. There were significant between-group differences for self-reported walking confidence and balance change, in favour of the balance group at Weeks 8 and 24 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A customised balance programme is feasible and safe for ambulant adults with cerebral palsy. Small effects from balance training in selected outcomes occurred. Study replication with at least 38 participants per group to confirm efficacy is warranted.Copyright © The Author(s) 2014.en
dc.languageenen
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.titleThe safety and feasibility of an intervention to improve balance dysfunction in ambulant adults with cerebral palsy: a pilot randomized controlled trial.en
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.affiliationPhysiotherapyen
dc.identifier.affiliationAllied Health-
dc.type.studyortrialRandomised controlled trial-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215514556299en
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen
dc.identifier.pubmedid25413169 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25413169]en
dc.identifier.source610979717en
dc.identifier.institution(Morgan) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia (Murphy) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (Opheim) Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway (Pogrebnoy) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (Kravtsov) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia (McGinley) Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australiaen
dc.rights.statementCopyright 2016 Medline is the source for the citation and abstract of this record.en
dc.subect.keywordsBalance cerebral palsy exercise randomized controlled trialen
dc.identifier.authoremailMorgan P.; prue.morgan@monash.eduen
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Morgan) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(Opheim) Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Nesoddtangen, Norway-
dc.identifier.affiliationext(McGinley) Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Kravtsov) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Murphy) Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Pogrebnoy) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia Clinical Research Centre for Movement Disorders & Gait, Monash Health, Victoria, Australia-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptAllied Health-
crisitem.author.deptMonash Ageing Research Centre (MONARC)-
crisitem.author.deptAllied Health-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on Jan 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.