Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48810
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJedwab R.M.-
dc.contributor.authorFranco, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorOwen D.-
dc.contributor.authorIngram A.-
dc.contributor.authorRedley B.-
dc.contributor.authorDobroff N.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T06:48:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-27T06:48:30Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-
dc.date.issued2022-09-15en
dc.identifier.citationApplied clinical informatics. 13(4) (pp 836-844), 2022. Date of Publication: 01 Aug 2022.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48810-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Introducing an electronic medical record (EMR) system into a complex health care environment fundamentally changes clinical workflows and documentation processes and, hence, has implications for patient safety. After a multisite "big-bang" EMR implementation across our large public health care organization, a quality improvement program was developed and implemented to monitor clinician adoption, documentation quality, and compliance with workflows to support high-quality patient care. OBJECTIVE(S): Our objective was to report the development of an iterative quality improvement program for nursing, midwifery, and medical EMR documentation. METHOD(S): The Model for Improvement quality improvement framework guided cycles of "Plan, Do, Study, Act." Steps included design, pre- and pilot testing of an audit tool to reflect expected practices for EMR documentation that examined quality and completeness of documentation 1-year post-EMR implementation. Analysis of initial audit results was then performed to (1) provide a baseline to benchmark comparison of ongoing improvement and (2) develop targeted intervention activities to address identified gaps. RESULT(S): Analysis of 1,349 EMR record audits as a baseline for the first cycle of EMR quality improvement revealed five out of nine nursing and midwifery documentation components, and four out of ten medical documentation components' completion and quality were classified as good (>80%). Outputs from this work also included a framework for strategies to improve EMR documentation quality, as well as an EMR data dashboard to monitor compliance. CONCLUSION(S): This work provides the foundation for the development of quality monitoring frameworks to inform both clinician and EMR optimization interventions using audits and feedback. Discipline-specific differences in performance can inform targeted interventions to maximize the effective use of resources and support longitudinal monitoring of EMR documentation and workflows. Future work will include repeat EMR auditing.Copyright Thieme. All rights reserved.-
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)-
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Clinical Informatics-
dc.subject.meshclinical documentation-
dc.subject.meshelectronic health record-
dc.subject.meshhealth care quality-
dc.titleImproving the Quality of Electronic Medical Record Documentation: Development of a Compliance and Quality Program.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.affiliationEMR & Informatics Program-
dc.identifier.affiliationDeakin University - Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Monash Health partnership-
dc.identifier.affiliationNursing Informatics-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756369-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.pubmedid36070801 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=36070801]-
dc.identifier.institution(Jedwab) Department of Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Jedwab) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Franco, Dobroff) Department of EMR and Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Franco) Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Owen) Department of Digital Health Training and Adoption, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Ingram) Department of Medical Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Redley) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Redley) Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Dobroff) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Jedwab) Department of Nursing and Midwifery Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Franco, Dobroff) Department of EMR and Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Owen) Department of Digital Health Training and Adoption, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Ingram) Department of Medical Informatics, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Redley) School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research-Monash Health Partnership, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Redley) Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptEMR & Informatics Program-
crisitem.author.deptNursing Informatics-
crisitem.author.deptEMR & Informatics Program-
crisitem.author.deptOncology-
crisitem.author.deptSupportive and Palliative Care-
crisitem.author.deptDeakin University - Monash Health Nursing Research Centre-
crisitem.author.deptNursing Informatics-
crisitem.author.deptEMR & Informatics Program-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

70
checked on Sep 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.