Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/49176
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDuronjic A.-
dc.contributor.authorKu D.-
dc.contributor.authorChavan S.-
dc.contributor.authorBucci T.-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor S.-
dc.contributor.authorPilcher D.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T00:38:26Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-30T00:38:26Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-
dc.date.issued2022-11-17en
dc.identifier.citationJournal of critical care. 73 (pp 154182), 2022. Date of Publication: 26 Oct 2022.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/49176-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: In a multicultural society, the impact of language proficiency and interpreter use on critical care patient outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE(S): To investigate the relationship between English language preference, requirement for an interpreter and in-hospital mortality amongst non-elective intensive care unit (ICU) patients. METHOD(S): Adult patients admitted to all 23 public ICUs within the state of Victoria, Australia from July 2007 to June 2018, were extracted from The Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database. De-identified patient data was matched using probabilistic methods and statistical linkage keys to the Victorian Admitted Episodes Database. Patients were classified into one of three groups: 'English preferred', 'English not preferred' and 'Interpreter required'. RESULT(S): 126,891 ICU admissions were analysed, of whom 3394 (3%) were in the 'English not preferred' group and 6355 (5%) in the 'Interpreter required' group. Compared to the 'English preferred', both the 'English not preferred' and 'Interpreter required' groups were older, had more co-morbidities and higher severity of illness scores. In-hospital mortality was 13.1% in the 'English preferred' group, 19.6% in the 'English not preferred' group and 16.7% in the 'Interpreter required' group. However, after adjusting for sex, severity of illness and socio-economic status, the 'English not preferred' group remained with a higher risk adjusted mortality (OR 1.21, 95%CI 1.07-1.36, P = 0.002), whereas the 'Interpreter required' group had a lower adjusted risk of mortality (OR 0.81, 95%CI 0.74-0.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION(S): Being identified as having a requirement for an interpreter was associated with improved outcomes for adults admitted to public hospital ICUs in Victoria. Interpreter services should be more readily available in the hospital setting. It is recommended that patients, family members and clinicians actively use interpreter services when English is not the preferred language of an ICU patient.Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.publisherNLM (Medline)-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Critical Care-
dc.subject.meshcommunication barrier-
dc.subject.meshintensive care-
dc.subject.meshinterpreter service-
dc.subject.meshpatient coding-
dc.subject.meshpublic hospital-
dc.subject.meshsocial status-
dc.titleThe impact of language barriers & interpreters on critical care patient outcomes.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.affiliationIntensive Care-
dc.type.studyortrialObservational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154182-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.pubmedid36368174 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=36368174]-
dc.identifier.institution(Duronjic, Taylor) Department of Intensive Care Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Ku) The Department of Intensive Care, Monash Health Dandenong, Victoria 3199, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell Victoria, 3124, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Chavan, Bucci) Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation 3124, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Pilcher) The Department of Intensive Care Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell Victoria, 3124, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria 3004, Australia; Safer Care Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Duronjic, Taylor) Department of Intensive Care Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Ku) The Department of Intensive Care, Monash Health Dandenong, Victoria 3199, Australia; The Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation, Camberwell Victoria, 3124, Australia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

20
checked on Jan 14, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.