Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50533
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaymond Y.-
dc.contributor.authorFernando S.-
dc.contributor.authorMenezes M.-
dc.contributor.authorMol B.W.-
dc.contributor.authorMcLennan A.-
dc.contributor.authorDA Silva Costa F.-
dc.contributor.authorHardy T.-
dc.contributor.authorRolnik D.L.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-28T04:54:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-28T04:54:08Z-
dc.date.copyright2023-
dc.date.issued2023-12-01en
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 230(4) (pp 381-389), 2024. Date of Publication: April 2024.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50533-
dc.description.abstractThe introduction of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has resulted in substantial reductions to previously accepted false-positive rates of prenatal screening. Despite this, the possibility of false-positive results remains a challenging consideration in clinical practice, particularly in light of the increasing uptake of genome-wide NIPT, and the subsequent increased proportion of high-risk results attributable to various biological events besides fetal aneuploidy. Confined placental mosaicism (CPM), whereby chromosome anomalies exclusively affect the placenta, is perhaps the most widely accepted cause of false-positive NIPT. There remains, however, a substantial degree of ambiguity in the literature pertaining to the clinical ramifications of CPM and its potential association with placental insufficiency, and consequentially adverse pregnancy outcomes including fetal growth restriction. Other causes of false-positive NIPT include vanishing twin syndrome, in which the cell-free DNA from a demised aneuploidy affected twin triggers a high-risk result, technical failures, and maternal origins of abnormal cell-free DNA such as uterine fibroids or unrecognized mosaicisms. Most concerningly, maternal malignancies are also a documented cause of false-positive screening results. In this review, we compile what is currently known about the various causes of false-positive NIPT.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology-
dc.subject.meshintrauterine growth retardation-
dc.subject.meshmosaicism-
dc.subject.meshnoninvasive prenatal testing-
dc.titlePlacental, maternal, fetal and technical origins of false-positive cell-free DNA screening results.-
dc.typeReview-
dc.identifier.affiliationObstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)-
dc.type.studyortrialReview article (e.g. literature review, narrative review)-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1240-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.pubmedid38008147 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=38008147]-
dc.identifier.institution(Raymond) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Fernando) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Obstetrics, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Menezes) Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Monash IVF Group, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Mol) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Women's Health Research, The University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK-
dc.identifier.institution(McLennan) Sydney Ultrasound for Women, Sydney, Australia; Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(DA Silva Costa) Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Queensland, Australia; School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Hardy) Monash IVF Group, Melbourne, Australia; Repromed Adelaide, Dulwich, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Rolnik) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Fernando) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Obstetrics, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Mol) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Centre for Women's Health Research, The University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Rolnik) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Women's, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia; Monash Ultrasound for Women, Melbourne, Australia-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
crisitem.author.deptObstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)-
crisitem.author.deptObstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

194
checked on May 30, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.