Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51389
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoos I.-
dc.contributor.authorSharmin S.-
dc.contributor.authorLechner-Scott J.-
dc.contributor.authorBuzzard K.-
dc.contributor.authorSkibina O.-
dc.contributor.authorVan Der Walt A.-
dc.contributor.authorButzkueven H.-
dc.contributor.authorButler E.-
dc.contributor.authorMacDonell R.-
dc.contributor.authorMcCombe P.-
dc.contributor.authorSlee M.-
dc.contributor.authorMalpas C.-
dc.contributor.authorKalincik T.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-10T23:56:40Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-10T23:56:40Z-
dc.date.copyright2022-
dc.date.issued2024-03-23en
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Neurology Open. Conference: Australian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists Annual Scientific Meeting, Anzan 2022. Virtual. 4(supplement 1) (pp A10-a11), 2022. Date of Publication: August 2022.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/51389-
dc.description.abstractObjective To compare the effectiveness of ocrelizumab with interferon-b, fingolimod and natalizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS). Method Using the MSBase registry, we identified patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated for >=6 months with ocrelizumab, interferons (interferon beta-1a, interferon b-1b subcutaneous or interferon b-1b intramuscular), fingolimod or natalizumab. Patients were matched with propensity score on baseline age, sex, MS duration, EDSS, relapse rate, prior therapy, disease activity, MRI, reason for discontinuation of preceding therapy and country. Annualised relapse rates (ARR) and cumulative hazard of relapses were compared in pairwise-censored groups. Results 106 patients treated with ocrelizumab were matched with 209 patients on interferon therapies. Over a pairwisecensored mean follow-up of 1.3 years, ocrelizumab was associated with lower relapse rates (ARR 0.08 vs 0.27, p<0.001) and lower risk of relapse (HR 0.30, 95%CI 0.15-0.57) than interferon-b. 297 patients treated with ocrelizumab were matched with 811 fingolimod-treated patients. Over a pairwise- censored mean follow-up of 1.5 years, ocrelizumab was associated with lower relapse rates (ARR 0.03 vs 0.14, p<0.001) and lower risk of relapse than fingolimod (HR 0.21, 0.13-0.32). 262 ocrelizumab-treated patients were matched with 343 natalizumab treated. Over a pairwise-censored mean follow-up of 1.6 years, ocrelizumab and natalizumab were associated with similar relapse rates (ARR 0.06 vs 0.08, p=0.39) and risk of relapse (HR 0.77, 0.45-1.33). Conclusions Treatment with ocrelizumab provides superior control of relapses than interferon-b and fingolimod. The effects of ocrelizumab and natalizumab on relapse activity are similar. Further evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of ocrelizumab on disability accumulation is warranted.-
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group-
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Neurology Open-
dc.subject.meshdisability-
dc.subject.meshnuclear magnetic resonance imaging-
dc.subject.meshrelapsing remitting multiple sclerosis-
dc.titleComparison of the effectiveness of ocrelizumab vs interferon b, fingolimod and natalizumab on relapses in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.-
dc.typeConference Abstract-
dc.identifier.affiliationNeurology-
dc.description.conferencenameAustralian and New Zealand Association of Neurologists Annual Scientific Meeting, ANZAN 2022-
dc.description.conferencelocationVirtual-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2022-ANZAN.26-
local.date.conferencestart2022-05-10-
dc.identifier.institution(Roos, Sharmin, Malpas, Kalincik) CORe Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Roos, Buzzard, Malpas, Kalincik) Department of Neurology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Roos, Buzzard, Skibina) Department of Neurology, Box Hill Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Lechner-Scott) School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Lechner-Scott) Department of Neurology, John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, NSW, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Buzzard, Skibina) Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Skibina, Van Der Walt, Butzkueven) Department of Neurology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Van Der Walt, Butzkueven) Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Butler) Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(MacDonell) Department of Neurology, Austin Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(McCombe) Department of Neurology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(McCombe) Univeristy of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Slee) Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia-
local.date.conferenceend2022-05-13-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Butler) Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
item.openairetypeConference Abstract-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptNeurology-
Appears in Collections:Conferences
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

66
checked on Apr 24, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.