Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52240
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoke P.-
dc.contributor.authorWang X.-
dc.contributor.authorLloyd M.-
dc.contributor.authorAshley S.E.-
dc.contributor.authorLozinsky A.C.-
dc.contributor.authorGold M.-
dc.contributor.authorO'Sullivan M.D.-
dc.contributor.authorQuinn P.-
dc.contributor.authorRobinson M.-
dc.contributor.authorGalvin A.D.-
dc.contributor.authorOrsini F.-
dc.contributor.authorTey D.-
dc.contributor.authorSu E.-L.-
dc.contributor.authorAxelrad C.-
dc.contributor.authorPitkin S.-
dc.contributor.authorMetcalfe J.-
dc.contributor.authorTang M.L.K.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-21T02:39:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-21T02:39:28Z-
dc.date.copyright2024-
dc.date.issued2024-08-07en
dc.identifier.citationAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 79(10) (pp 2759-2774), 2024. Date of Publication: October 2024.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/52240-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Few studies have examined long-term outcomes following oral immunotherapy (OIT); none have examined long-term risks and benefits associated with distinct clinical outcomes (desensitization, remission). Method(s): Participants completing the probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) -003 randomized trial were enrolled in a follow-on study, PPOIT-003LT. Peanut ingestion, reactions, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) were monitored prospectively. Outcomes at 1-year and 2-years post-treatment were examined by treatment group and by post-OIT clinical outcome (remission, desensitization without remission [DWR], allergic). Result(s): 86% (151/176) of eligible children enrolled. Post-treatment peanut ingestion at 2-years post-treatment were similar for PPOIT (86.7%) and OIT (78.7%) groups, both higher than placebo (10.3%). Reactions reduced over time for all treatment and clinical outcome groups (PPOIT 31.7% to 23.3%, OIT 37.7% to 19.7%, placebo 13.8% to 6.9%; remission 27.5% to 15.9%; DWR 57.9% to 36.8%; allergic 11.6% to 7%). At 2-years post-treatment, similar proportions of remission and allergic participants reported reactions (RD 0.09 (95%CI -0.03, 0.20), p =.127), whereas more DWR participants reported reactions than remission (remission vs DWR: RD -0.21 (95%CI -0.39; -0.03), p =.02) and allergic (DWR vs allergic: RD 0.30 (95%CI 0.13, 0.47), p =.001) participants. At 2-years post-treatment, 0% remission versus 5.3% DWR versus 2.3% allergic participants reported adrenaline injector usage. Remission participants had significantly greater HRQOL improvement (adjusted for baseline) compared with both DWR (MD -0.54 (95%CI -0.99, -0.10), p =.017) and allergic (MD -0.82 (95%CI -1.25, -0.38), p <.001). Conclusion(s): By 2-years post-treatment, remission participants reported fewer reactions, less severe reactions and greater HRQOL improvement compared with DWR and allergic participants, indicating that remission is the patient-preferred treatment outcome over desensitization or remaining allergic.Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Allergy published by European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.-
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc-
dc.relation.ispartofAllergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-
dc.subject.meshoral immunotherapy-
dc.subject.meshpeanut allergy-
dc.titleTwo-year post-treatment outcomes following peanut oral immunotherapy in the Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy-003 Long-Term (PPOIT-003LT) study.-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.affiliationPaediatric - Allergy and Immunology-
dc.type.studyortrialRandomised controlled trial-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/all.16262-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.pubmedid39099231 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=39099231]-
dc.identifier.institution(Loke, Wang, Lloyd, Ashley, Lozinsky, Robinson, Orsini, Tang) Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Loke, Ashley, Tang) Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Loke) Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Lloyd) Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Ashley, Robinson, Tang) Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Gold, Quinn) Department of Paediatrics, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Gold, Quinn) Women's and Children's Hospital Adelaide, North Adelaide, SA, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(O'Sullivan) Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Child and Adolescent Health Service, Nedlands, WA, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(O'Sullivan) Discipline of Paediatrics, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(O'Sullivan) Telethon Kids Institute, Nedlands, WA, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Galvin) School of Applied Psychology, Cork University Hospital, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland-
dc.identifier.institution(Galvin) Allergy Research Network, Ireland-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Loke) Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

10
checked on Dec 16, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.