Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53037
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta A.K.-
dc.contributor.authorZaka A.-
dc.contributor.authorLombardo A.-
dc.contributor.authorTsimiklis J.-
dc.contributor.authorStretton B.-
dc.contributor.authorKovoor J.G.-
dc.contributor.authorBacchi S.-
dc.contributor.authorRamponi F.-
dc.contributor.authorChan J.C.Y.-
dc.contributor.authorThiagalingam A.-
dc.contributor.authorGould P.-
dc.contributor.authorSivagangabalan G.-
dc.contributor.authorZaman S.-
dc.contributor.authorChow C.-
dc.contributor.authorKovoor P.-
dc.contributor.authorSmith J.A.-
dc.contributor.authorBennetts J.S.-
dc.contributor.authorMaddern G.J.-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-09T22:37:00Z-
dc.date.available2025-01-09T22:37:00Z-
dc.date.copyright2025-
dc.date.issued2024-12-26en
dc.identifier.citationSurgery (United States). 180(no pagination), 2025. Article Number: 109003. Date of Publication: April 2025.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/53037-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The decision to continue aspirin before elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains contentious because of competing thrombotic and bleeding risks. We performed a contemporary systematic review and meta-analysis to compare outcomes between patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting who stopped and continued aspirin before surgery. Method(s): PubMed, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to 4 October 2023 for randomized controlled trials comparing patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting who continued preoperative aspirin with those who discontinued before surgery. Studies with cointervention arms and multivariable-adjusted or propensity matched observational studies were excluded. Summary odds ratios were calculated using a random effects model for dichotomous and continuous variables. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted in order to explore sources of heterogeneity. Result(s): Fifteen eligible randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 6,188 patients. Patients who continued aspirin demonstrated no significant difference in all-cause mortality (odds ratio, 1.37; confidence interval, 0.81-2.33), perioperative myocardial infarction (odds ratio, 0.81; confidence interval, 0.55-1.18), and postoperative blood loss (mean difference, 66.12 mL; confidence interval, -1.45 to 133.69). No significant difference was observed between low-dose and greater doses of aspirin. There was minimal heterogeneity amongst included studies (I2 = 0%, P = .97, I2 = 33%, P = .13, and I2= 76, P = .06, respectively). Studies were of low methodologic quality according to Cochrane Risk of Bias for Randomized Trials. Conclusion(s): This largest to-date systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant difference for risk of all-cause mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, and postoperative bleeding between patients continuing and stopping aspirin before coronary artery bypass grafting.Copyright © 2024 The Authors-
dc.publisherElsevier Inc.-
dc.relation.ispartofSurgery-
dc.subject.meshblood transfusion-
dc.subject.meshcoronary artery bypass graft-
dc.subject.meshheart infarction-
dc.subject.meshpostoperative hemorrhage-
dc.titlePerioperative aspirin and coronary artery bypass graft surgery: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.-
dc.typeReview-
dc.identifier.affiliationCardiothoracic Surgery-
dc.identifier.affiliationCardiology (MonashHeart)-
dc.type.studyortrialReview article (e.g. literature review, narrative review)-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.109003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.institution(Gupta, Tsimiklis, Stretton, Kovoor, Bacchi, Maddern) Discipline of Surgery, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Zaka) Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Lombardo) Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Ramponi) Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States-
dc.identifier.institution(Chan) New York University, New York, NY, United States-
dc.identifier.institution(Thiagalingam, Gould, Sivagangabalan, Zaman, Chow, Kovoor) Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Bennetts) School of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Smith, Bennetts) Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Victorian Heart Hospital, Melbourne, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Maddern) Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures-Surgical, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Maddern) Research, Audit and Academic Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Adelaide, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Smith, Bennetts) Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Victorian Heart Hospital, Melbourne, Australia-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairetypeReview-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptCardiology (MonashHeart & Victorian Heart Institute)-
crisitem.author.deptCardiothoracic Surgery-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on Feb 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.