Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/58167
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRoadley J.-
dc.contributor.authorDaly C.-
dc.contributor.authorRogers M.-
dc.contributor.authorDanks R.A.-
dc.contributor.authorSher I.-
dc.contributor.authorKam J.-
dc.contributor.authorCastle-Kirszbaum M.-
dc.contributor.authorAyton S.-
dc.contributor.authorFryer K.-
dc.contributor.authorRisbey P.-
dc.contributor.authorGoldschlager T.-
dc.date.accessioned2026-05-06T22:43:53Z-
dc.date.available2026-05-06T22:43:53Z-
dc.date.copyright2026-
dc.date.issued2026-04-29en
dc.identifier.citationSpine. (no pagination), 2026. Date of Publication: 23 Apr 2026.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/58167-
dc.description.abstractSTUDY DESIGN: Single-blinded randomised controlled trial. OBJECTIVE(S): To establish the effect of postoperative mobility restrictions on outcome after lumbar microdiscectomy by comparing sitting and activity restrictions to no restrictions for the first month after surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar microdiscectomy effectively treats lumbar radiculopathy, improving leg pain and functional outcomes. However, 20% of patients experience residual sciatica and 5% require redo discectomy. Persistent sciatica causes suffering, increases healthcare costs, and results in work absenteeism. While strategies to prevent reherniation include postoperative mobility restriction, evidence is limited regarding efficacy. Most surgeons still advise sitting or lifting restrictions after microdiscectomy. METHOD(S): Two hundred patients (ages 18-75) undergoing unilateral microdiscectomy were randomised 1:1 to restricted (n=101) or unrestricted (n=99) groups. Restricted patients received limitations on sitting (15-30 min per two hours), lifting (<5 kg), and strenuous activities for two weeks. Unrestricted patients resumed normal activities as tolerated. All patients wore activity monitors (ActiV8) for one month. Assessments at baseline, day 1, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months included VAS pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, and quality-of-life questionnaires. The primary outcome was a composite of reduced pain, functional improvement, and absence of further interventions at 12 months. RESULT(S): At one year, the primary composite outcome showed no significant difference between groups (restricted (41.6%) vs. unrestricted (36.4%), P=0.45). Secondary outcomes for restricted vs unrestricted groups respectively, including reherniation rates (10.1% vs. 14.1%, P=0.61), pain measures (VAS back reduction to 23.5 pts vs. 24.5 pts, P=0.83), functional improvements (SF-12 PCS 50.3 vs. 49.7 pts at 1 y, P = 0.57), and reoperation rates (2.9% vs. 5.5%, P=0.68) were similar. Activity monitoring revealed poor adherence to restrictions (10%) with no significant differences in sitting duration or other activities between groups (4,102 vs. 4,140 mins/wk, P=0.89). CONCLUSION(S): Liberalizing post-operative restrictions following lumbar microdiscectomy does not compromise outcomes. These findings support patient-driven recovery guided by comfort rather than rigid restrictions, potentially standardizing care guidelines and facilitating faster return to activities without compromising safety.Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.-
dc.relation.ispartofSpine-
dc.subject.meshabsenteeism-
dc.subject.meshactivity tracker-
dc.subject.meshaged-
dc.subject.meshbiomechanics-
dc.subject.meshdiscectomy-
dc.subject.meshhealth care cost-
dc.subject.meshleg pain-
dc.subject.meshlumbar microdiscectomy-
dc.subject.meshmicrodiscectomy-
dc.subject.meshmobilization-
dc.subject.meshOswestry Disability Index-
dc.subject.meshpain-
dc.subject.meshpolyradiculoneuropathy-
dc.subject.meshquality of life-
dc.subject.meshradiculopathy-
dc.subject.meshrehabilitation-
dc.subject.meshreoperation-
dc.subject.meshsciatica-
dc.subject.meshShort Form 12-
dc.subject.meshsingle blind procedure-
dc.subject.meshsitting-
dc.subject.meshspine surgery-
dc.subject.meshsurgery-
dc.titleLumbar Microdiscectomy and Post-operative Activity Restrictions: A Randomised Controlled Trial.-
dc.typeArticle In Press-
dc.identifier.affiliationNeurosurgery-
dc.identifier.doihttp://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005720-
dc.publisher.placeUnited States-
dc.identifier.pubmedid42023774-
dc.identifier.institution(Roadley) Monash Medical Centre, University of Queensland, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Daly) Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Rogers, Goldschlager) Cabrini Hospital, Malvern, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Danks, Sher, Kam, Castle-Kirszbaum, Fryer, Goldschlager) Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Danks, Goldschlager) Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
dc.identifier.institution(Ayton) MelbourneVICUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.institution(Risbey) Cabrini Hospital Malvern, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Danks, Sher, Kam, Castle-Kirszbaum, Fryer, Goldschlager) Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia-
dc.identifier.affiliationmh(Danks, Goldschlager) Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeArticle In Press-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptNeurosurgery-
Appears in Collections:Articles
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

32
checked on May 23, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.