Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/26541
Title: | Effect of I/E ratio on mean alveolar pressure during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation. | Authors: | Wilkinson M.H.;Ramsden C.A.;Pillow J.J.;Neil H. | Institution: | (Pillow, Ramsden) Newborn Services, Monash Medical Centre, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia (Neil) Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Clayton, Vic. 3168, Australia (Wilkinson) Ritchie Ctr. for Baby Hlth. Research, Inst. of Repro. and Development, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia (Pillow) TVW Telethon Inst. Child Hlth. Res., PO Box 855, West Perth , WA 6872, Australia | Issue Date: | 20-Oct-2012 | Copyright year: | 1999 | Publisher: | American Physiological Society American Physiological Society (9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20814-3991, United States) |
Place of publication: | United States | Publication information: | Journal of Applied Physiology. 87 (1) (pp 407-414), 1999. Date of Publication: July 1999. | Journal: | Journal of Applied Physiology | Abstract: | This study investigated factors contributing to differences between mean alveolar pressure (PA) and mean pressure at the airway opening, (Pao) during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV). The effect of the inspiratory-to-expiratory time (I/E) ratio and amplitude of oscillation on the magnitude of PA - Pao (Pdiff) was examined by using the alveolar capsule technique in normal rabbit lungs (n = 4) and an in vitro lung model. The effect of ventilator frequency and endotracheal tube (ETT) diameter on Pdiff was further examined in the in vitro lung model at an I/E ratio of 1:2. In both lung models, PA fell below Pao during HFOV when inspiratory time was shorter than expiratory time. Under these conditions, differences between inspiratory and expiratory flows, combined with the nonlinear relationship between resistive pressure drop and flow in the ETT, are the principal determinants of Pdiff. In our experiments, the magnitude of Pdiff at each combination of I/E, frequency, lung compliance, and ETT resistance could be predicted from the difference between the mean squared inspiratory and expiratory velocities in the ETT. These observations provide an explanation for the measured differences in mean pressure between the airway opening and the alveoli during HFOV and will assist in the development of optimal strategies for the clinical application of this technique. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.87.1.407 | PubMed URL: | 10409602 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=10409602] | ISSN: | 8750-7587 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/26541 | Type: | Article |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.