Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28116
Title: Efficacy of entecavir with or without tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for nucleos(t)ide-nave patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Authors: Trinh H.;Cohen D.;Lovegren M.;Akarca U.S.;Llamoso C.;Lok A.S.;Carosi G.;Wong D. ;Sievert W. ;Habersetzer F.;Gadano A.
Institution: (Lok) Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, 3912 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States (Trinh) Pacific Health Foundation, San Jose, CA, United States (Carosi) Institute of Infectious and Tropical Disease, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy (Akarca) Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey (Gadano) Seccin Hepatologa, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires-Argentina, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Habersetzer) Service d'Hpato-gastroentrologie, Nouvel Hopital Civil, Universite de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France (Sievert) Department of Medicine, Monash University, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia (Wong) Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada (Lovegren, Cohen, Llamoso) Research and Development, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Wallingford, CT, United States
Issue Date: 6-Sep-2012
Copyright year: 2012
Publisher: W.B. Saunders
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Gastroenterology. 143 (3) (pp 619-628.e1), 2012. Date of Publication: September 2012.
Journal: Gastroenterology
Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are potent antiviral agents that might have additive or synergistic antiviral activity in treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We compared the efficacy and safety of ETV monotherapy with those of a combination of ETV and TDF. METHOD(S): We performed a randomized, open-label, multicenter, superiority study of 379 nucleos(t)ide-nave patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive (n = 264) or HBeAg-negative (n = 115) CHB. Subjects were given ETV 0.5 mg (n = 182) or a combination of ETV 0.5 mg and TDF 300 mg (n = 197) for 100 weeks. RESULT(S): At week 96, comparable proportions of patients in each study arm achieved the primary end point of a level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <50 IU/mL (83.2% vs 76.4%; P = .088). Among HBeAg-positive patients, a greater proportion given combination therapy achieved levels of HBV DNA <50 IU/mL than those given ETV alone (80.4% vs 69.8%; P = .046). However, this difference was observed only in patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA <108 IU/mL (79% vs 62%) and not in those with baseline levels of HBV DNA <108 IU/mL (83% in both arms). Rates of HBeAg loss and HBeAg seroconversion were comparable between groups, whereas the rate of alanine aminotransferase normalization was greater in the ETV monotherapy group. No HBV variants associated with ETV or TDF resistance were detected. Safety profiles were consistent with previous reports of ETV or TDF monotherapy. CONCLUSION(S): The antiviral efficacy of ETV monotherapy is comparable to that of ETV plus TDF in a mixed population of nucleos(t)ide-nave patients with CHB (70% HBeAg positive). The combination therapy could provide an incremental benefit to HBeAg-positive patients with baseline levels of HBV DNA >=108 IU/mL. Clinical trial information: ETV-110, the BE-LOW study; NCT00410072. © 2012 AGA Institute.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.037
PubMed URL: 22643350 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=22643350]
ISSN: 0016-5085
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28116
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on Oct 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.