Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28131
Title: Early and late outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: An Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database Study.
Authors: Smith J.A. ;Newcomb A.E.;Shardey G.C.;Saxena A.;Poh C.-L.;Dinh D.T.;Reid C.M.
Monash Health Department(s): Cardiothoracic Surgery
Institution: (Saxena, Newcomb) Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia (Poh, Dinh, Reid) Department of Epidemiology and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Prahran, VIC, Australia (Smith) Department of Surgery MMC, Monash University and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, Australia (Shardey) Cabrini Medical Centre, Malvern, VIC, Australia (Newcomb) Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 31-Dec-2012
Copyright year: 2012
Publisher: Oxford University Press (Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP, United Kingdom)
Place of publication: Netherlands
Publication information: European Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 41 (1) (pp 63-68), 2012. Date of Publication: 2012.
Abstract: Objective: The advent of percutaneous aortic valve implantation has increased interest in the outcomes of conventional aortic valve replacement in elderly patients. The current study critically evaluates the short-term and long-term outcomes of elderly (=80 years) Australian patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. Method(s): Data obtained prospectively between June 2001 and December 2009 by the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Surgery Database Program were retrospectively analysed. Isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 2791 patients; of these, 531 (19%) were at least 80 years old (group 1). The patient characteristics, morbidity and short-term mortality of these patients were compared with those of patients who were <80 years old (group 2). The long-term outcomes in elderly patients were compared with the age-adjusted Australian population. Result(s): Group 1 patients were more likely to be female (58.6% vs 38.0%, p < 0.001) and presented more often with co-morbidities including hypertension, cerebrovascular disease and peripheral vascular disease (all p < 0.05). The 30-day mortality rate was not independently higher in group 1 patients (4.0% vs 2.0%, p = 0.144). Group 1 patients had an independently increased risk of complications including new renal failure (11.7% vs 4.2%, p < 0.001), prolonged (=24 h) ventilation (12.4% vs 7.2%, p = 0.003), gastrointestinal complications (3.0% vs 1.3%, p = 0.012) and had a longer mean length of intensive care unit stay (64 h vs 47 h, p < 0.001). The 5-year survival post-aortic valve replacement was 72%, which is comparable to that of the age-matched Australian population. CONCLUSION(S): Conventional aortic valve replacement in elderly patients achieves excellent outcomes with long-term survival comparable to that of an age-adjusted Australian population. In an era of percutaneous aortic valve implantation, it should still be regarded as the gold standard in the management of aortic stenosis. © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.03.059
PubMed URL: 21601470 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=21601470]
ISSN: 1010-7940
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/28131
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

18
checked on Feb 6, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.