Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/34794
Title: | Tissue adhesive and adhesive tape for pediatric wound closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. | Authors: | Pacilli M. ;Nataraja R.M.;Tandon S.;Smale M. | Monash Health Department(s): | Paediatric - General Surgery | Institution: | (Tandon, Smale, Pacilli, Nataraja) Department of Paediatric Surgery, Monash Children's Hospital, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia (Pacilli, Nataraja) Department of Paediatrics & Surgery, School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia | Issue Date: | 7-Sep-2020 | Copyright year: | 2020 | Publisher: | W.B. Saunders | Place of publication: | United States | Publication information: | Journal of Pediatric Surgery. (no pagination), 2020. Date of Publication: 2020. | Journal: | Journal of Pediatric Surgery | Abstract: | Background: Tissue adhesive (TiA), adhesive tape (AdT), and sutures can be used to close surgical wounds and lacerations in children. However, it is unclear which technique produces the best results. Method(s): In this prospectively registered study, the PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Database, and ScienceDirect databases were searched. English language studies published between January 1980 and August 2017 evaluating TiA and/or AdT for primary skin closure of surgical wounds or lacerations in patients aged <= 18 years were included. Study endpoints included clinician-rated wound cosmesis and incidence of wound complications. Result(s): Thirty-one studies were included in the systematic review and 16 studies in the meta-analysis. Amongst heterogeneous studies, AdT yielded marginally better cosmetic outcomes than TiA (p = 0.04). There was no difference in cosmesis between sutured wounds and those closed with TiA (p = 0.2). No difference in overall risk of wound infection or dehiscence was identified when comparing TiA with AdT (p = 0.3), and TiA with sutures (p = 0.9 and 0.3 respectively). Conclusion(s): TiA, AdT, and sutures can all be used for wound closure with equivalent risk of wound infection and dehiscence. AdT appears to convey better cosmesis. Further adequately powered studies directly comparing techniques are required. Levels of Evidence: Level IV.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. | DOI: | http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.037 | PubMed URL: | 32888718 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=32888718] | ISSN: | 0022-3468 | URI: | https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/34794 | Type: | Review | Subjects: | surgical wound suture wound closure wound tissue adhesive wound infection adhesive tape English (language) esthetic surgery laceration ScienceDirect |
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: | Systematic review and/or meta-analysis |
Appears in Collections: | Articles |
Show full item record
Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.