Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/35381
Title: Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review.
Authors: Kemper J.M.;Vollenhoven B.J. ;Talmor A.J.
Monash Health Department(s): Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Monash Women's)
Institution: (Kemper, Talmor) Gynaecology, Monash Health Women's and Newborn Programme, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia (Vollenhoven) Gynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (Vollenhoven) Monash IVF, Richmond, Australia (Vollenhoven, Talmor) Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
Issue Date: 3-Mar-2020
Copyright year: 2019
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins (E-mail: kathiest.clai@apta.org)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey. 74 (12) (pp 727-737), 2019. Date of Publication: 01 Dec 2019.
Journal: Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Abstract: Importance Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has undergone many technical developments over recent years, including changes in biopsy timings, methodology, and genetic analysis techniques. The evidence surrounding the efficaciousness of PGT-A is sporadic and inconsistent; as such, significant doubt and concern remain regarding its widespread implementation. Objective This review seeks to describe the historical development of PGT-A and to analyze and summarize the current published literature. Conclusions At times during its infancy, PGT-A failed to display conclusive improvements in results; with newer technologies, PGT-A appears to yield superior outcomes, including reductions in miscarriages and multiple gestations. Clinicians and patients should assess the use of PGT-A on a case-by-case basis, with laboratories encouraged to utilize blastocyst biopsy and next-generation sequencing when conducting PGT-A. Further studies providing cumulative live birth rates and time to live birth are required if PGT-A is to be proven as producing superior outcomes. Relevance PGT-A has the potential ability to impact in vitro fertilization success rates, and as it is increasingly adopted worldwide, it is crucial that clinicians are aware of the evidence for its continued use. Target Audience Obstetricians and gynecologists, family physicians. Learning Objectives After reading this review, physicians should be better able to summarize the history of PGT-A, including the development over time of biopsy and analytical techniques; explain the continued uncertainty regarding the efficacy of PGT-A and the associated safety concerns; and assess the impact mosaicism may have on the interpretation of PGT-A results and subsequent treatment recommendations.Copyright © Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0000000000000737
PubMed URL: 31881090 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=31881090]
ISSN: 0029-7828
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/35381
Type: Review
Subjects: spontaneous abortion
embryo transfer
aneuploidy
biopsy
birth rate
blastocyst
chromosome
genetic screening
high throughput sequencing
in vitro fertilization
live birth
mosaicism
nidation
preimplantation genetic
prenatal
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Review article (e.g. literature review, narrative review)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Feb 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.