Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37234
Title: Cetuximab Alone or With Irinotecan for Resistant KRAS-, NRAS-, BRAF- and PIK3CA-wild-type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The AGITG Randomized Phase II ICECREAM Study.
Authors: Segelov E. ;Waring P.M.;Tejpar S.;Khasraw M.;Van Hazel G.A.;Simes J.;Gebski V.J.;Desai J.;Shapiro J.D.;Thavaneswaran S.;Underhill C.R.;Robledo K.P.;Karapetis C.S.;Day F.L.;Nott L.M.;Jefford M.;Chantrill L.A.;Pavlakis N.;Tebbutt N.C.;Price T.J.
Monash Health Department(s): Oncology
Institution: (Shapiro) Cabrini Haematology and Oncology Centre, Cabrini Hospital and Monash University, Malvern, Victoria, Australia (Thavaneswaran, Robledo, Khasraw, Simes, Gebski) National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia (Underhill) Albury-Wodonga Regional Cancer Centre and University of New South Wales, East Albury, New South Wales, Australia (Karapetis) Department of Medical Oncology, Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia (Day) Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital and University of Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia (Nott) Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia (Jefford) Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Chantrill) Department of Medical Oncology, Kinghorn Cancer Centre, St Vincent's Hospital and University of New South Wales, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia (Pavlakis) Northern Cancer Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia (Tebbutt) Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia (Price) Medical Oncology Unit, Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Lyell McEwin Hospital, Elizabeth Vale, South Australia, Australia (Khasraw) Department of Medical Oncology, Geelong Hospital, Geelong, Victoria, Australia (Van Hazel) School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia (Waring) Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Tejpar) Oncology Department, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (Desai) Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Melbourne Hospital and Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (Segelov) Department of Oncology, Monash Health and Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 28-Nov-2018
Copyright year: 2018
Publisher: Elsevier Inc. (E-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Clinical Colorectal Cancer. 17 (4) (pp 313-319), 2018. Date of Publication: December 2018.
Journal: Clinical Colorectal Cancer
Abstract: Most unresectable metastatic colon cancer remains incurable, with a median survival of less than 3 years. Molecularly targeted therapies have recently been developed; in particular, monoclonal antibodies against the epidermal growth factor receptor, which are efficacious in 40% to 60% of chemotherapy-resistant patients with wild-type KRAS. This study shows that cetuximab plus irinotecan, compared with cetuximab alone, increases the response rate and delays progression in irinotecan-resistant RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. Background(s): The Irinotecan Cetuximab Evaluation and Cetuximab Response Evaluation (ICECREAM) study assessed the efficacy of cetuximab monotherapy compared with cetuximab combined with chemotherapy for quadruple wild-type (KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, or P13KCA exon 20) metastatic colorectal cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter, phase II trial and randomly assigned to cetuximab 400 mg/m2, then 250 mg/m2 cetuximab weekly, with or without irinotecan 180 mg/m2 every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival; secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival, toxicity, and quality of life. Result(s): From 2012 to 2016, 48 patients were recruited. Two were ineligible, and 2 were not evaluable for response. Characteristics were balanced, except gender (male, 62% vs. 72%) and primary sidedness (left, 95% vs. 68%). For cetuximab compared with cetuximab-irinotecan, progression-free survival was 14% versus 41% (hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.78; P =.008); response rate was 10% (2 partial responses) versus 38% (1 complete, 8 partial); P =.04. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities were less with cetuximab monotherapy (23% vs. 50%); global and specific quality of life scores did not differ. Conclusion(s): In comparison with cetuximab alone, cetuximab plus irinotecan increases the response rate and delays progression in irinotecan-resistant RAS wild-type colorectal cancer. This echoes data from molecularly unselected patients.Copyright © 2018
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clcc.2018.06.002
ORCID: Jefford, Michael; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8792-7807 Price, Timothy. J.; ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2693
PubMed URL: 30463680 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=30463680]
ISSN: 1533-0028
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37234
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Sep 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.