Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37619
Title: 'Missed' oesophageal adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus patients: A large population-based study.
Authors: Coleman H.G.;van Putten M.;Johnston B.T.;Murray L.J.;Gavin A.T.;McManus D.T.;Bhat S.;Turkington R.C.
Institution: (van Putten) Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Eindhoven, Netherlands (Johnston) Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom (Murray, Gavin, Coleman) Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom (Gavin) Northern Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom (McManus) Department of Pathology, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom (Bhat) Department of Gastroenterology, Craigavon Area Hospital, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom (Turkington) Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
Issue Date: 18-May-2018
Copyright year: 2018
Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd (E-mail: info@sagepub.co.uk)
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: United European Gastroenterology Journal. 6 (4) (pp 519-528), 2018. Date of Publication: 01 May 2018.
Abstract: Background: A systematic review suggests that 25% of oesophageal adenocarcinomas (OAC) are 'missed' at index endoscopy for Barrett's oesophagus (BO); however, this included few population-based studies and may be an overestimate. Objective(s): The objective of this article is to quantify the 'missed' rates of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and OAC at index BO endoscopy. Method(s): Patients from the Northern Ireland BO register diagnosed between 1993 and 2010 (n = 13,159) were linked to the Northern Ireland Cancer Registry to identify patients who developed OAC or HGD. Logistic regression analysis compared characteristics of 'missed' vs 'incident' HGD/OAC, defined as diagnoses within 3-12 months vs >1 year after incident BO, respectively. Result(s): A total of 267 patients were diagnosed with HGD/OAC >=3 months after BO diagnosis, of whom 34 (12.7%) were potentially 'missed'. The proportion of 'missed' HGD/OAC was 25% among BO patients with low-grade dysplasia (LGD) and 9% among non-dysplastic BO patients. Older age and BO-LGD carried a higher risk of 'missed' HGD/OAC. Non-dysplastic BO patients were more often diagnosed with a 'missed' OAC (rather than HGD; 89%), compared with BO-LGD patients (40%). Conclusion(s): Approximately one in 10 HGD/OAC cases are 'missed' at incident BO diagnosis, which is significant but lower than previous reports. However, 'missed' HGD/OAC cases represent only 0.26% of all BO patients.Copyright © 2017, © Author(s) 2017.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050640617737466
ISSN: 2050-6406
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37619
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

4
checked on Sep 28, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.