Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37739
Conference/Presentation Title: Cancer patients' perceptions of palliative care.
Authors: William L.;Runacres F.;Franco M. ;Poon P. ;Yoong J.;Chosich B.;Burgess M.;Earnest A.
Monash Health Department(s): Supportive and Palliative Care
Institution: (Yoong, Chosich, Burgess, Runacres, William, Franco, Poon) Supportive and Palliative Care Unit, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia (Earnest) Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 22-Jul-2019
Copyright year: 2018
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication information: Annals of Oncology. Conference: 43rd Congress of European Society for Medical Oncology, ESMO 2018. Munich Germany. 29 (Supplement 8) (pp viii551-viii552), 2018. Date of Publication: October 2018.
Abstract: Background: Despite clear benefits and increased efforts towards earlier integration of palliative care (PC) with oncology, there are concerns that PC remains stigmatized and predominantly associated with end-of-life care (EOLC). This project aims to explore current perceptions and understanding of PC in cancer patients. Method(s): Prospective survey conducted in the oncology ward of a tertiary academic hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Over a 4-month period a 16-item questionnaire was distributed to all cancer patients upon admission to the ward (N=103). Chi-Squared test was used to examine for significant factors related to patients' perceptions of PC. Result(s): Ninety-six patients (93%) completed the questionnaire; of which 76% had metastatic cancer. Of the domains explored, salient findings were: 1) Familiarity and experience: 76% had heard of PC; while only 21% had received PC. Self-rating of PC knowledge was varied, and evenly distributed: 31% good/excellent, 36% average and 33% below average/poor. 2) Roles of PC and oncology: 86% believed they could receive concurrent oncology care and 81% believed they could receive anti-cancer treatment whilst receiving PC. Those who had heard of PC were significantly more likely to respond that they could receive concurrent anti-cancer treatment (p=0.005), as well as those who had better self-rated PC knowledge (p=0.045). 3) Perceptions: 45% believed PC was only associated with EOLC. Those more likely to disagree with this statement had received PC services (p=0.039). The majority (77%) felt comforted with PC involvement; this was significantly associated with older age (p=0.047) and an understanding that oncology (p<0.005) and anti-cancer treatment (p=0.013) could continue. However, 40% felt frightened and 29% felt hopeless about a referral to PC. Notably, 50% felt more comfortable with "supportive care" services (versus PC), 25% were neutral and 25% were not. Conclusion(s): This survey had an excellent response rate and results were reassuring that, in general, respondents had an accurate understanding of and positive perceptions of PC. Familiarity and comfort with PC were associated with significantly better understanding of PC. This may reflect overall progress in integration of PC and oncology care.
Conference Start Date: 2018-10-19
Conference End Date: 2018-10-23
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy295.012
ISSN: 1569-8041
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/37739
Type: Conference Abstract
Subjects: controlled study
female
human
major clinical study
male
metastasis
oncology ward
*palliative therapy
patient referral
*perception
prospective study
questionnaire
terminal care
conference abstract
*cancer patient
aged
cancer therapy
comfort
age
Australia
*perception
prospective study
questionnaire
terminal care
metastasis
male
major clinical study
human
female
controlled study
oncology ward
cancer therapy
comfort
*palliative therapy
patient referral
*cancer patient
Australia
aged
age
Appears in Collections:Conferences

Show full item record

Page view(s)

28
checked on Jun 27, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.