Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/38112
Conference/Presentation Title: The impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on people with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial.
Authors: Rawlings S. ;Holland A.;Liacos A.;Moore R.;Nichols A.;Lahham A.;McDonald C.;Cox N.
Monash Health Department(s): Physiotherapy
Allied Health
Institution: (Lahham, Cox, Liacos, Holland) Department of Physiotherapy, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia (Lahham, McDonald, Cox, Holland) Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Melbourne, Australia (McDonald) Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (McDonald) Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (Rawlings, Nichols) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia (Moore) Department of Physiotherapy, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia (Liacos, Holland) Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
Presentation/Conference Date: 15-May-2018
Copyright year: 2018
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing
Publication information: Respirology. Conference: Australia and New Zealand Society of Respiratory Science and the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand Annual Scientific Meeting , ANZSRS/TSANZ 2018. Adelaide, SA Australia. 23 (Supplement 1) (pp 91), 2018. Date of Publication: March 2018.
Abstract: Introduction/Aim: People with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience exercise intolerance, dyspnoea and poor health-related quality of life. However, the role of pulmonary rehabilitation in this group is unclear. This randomised controlled trial aimed to explore effects of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) in people with mild COPD. Method(s): People with mild COPD (FEV1/FVC<70%; FEV1>80%predicted) with a smoking history of >= 10 packet years were randomised to either 8-weeks of home-based PR (one home visit and seven onceweekly telephone calls) or attention control (weekly social telephone calls). Six-minute walk distance (6MWD), modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnoea score and Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) scores were compared between groups post intervention and at 6- months. Result(s): A total of 58 participants (34 females, mean age 68 (SD 9) years, FEV1 90 (7) %predicted, 6MWD 496 (105) metres) were included with 29 participants randomised to home-based PR. Participants attended an average of 6.8 of the eight scheduled sessions, ranging from three to eight sessions. Both groups showed improvements in exercise capacity, symptoms and health-related quality of life over time, however there was no between-group differences in the primary outcome of 6MWD at endintervention (mean difference 1.4 metres, 95% confidence interval (CI) - 28.7 to 31.4 metres) or six months (9.8 metres, 95% CI -30.5 to 50.2 metres). At 6-months follow-up home-based PR participants were more likely to have clinically important improvements in CRQ emotional function (50% of home PR vs 0% control, p<0.001) and CRQ total score (45% vs 17%, p=0.05), however there were no other differences in symptoms or other aspects of health-related quality of life. Conclusion(s): For people with mild COPD, home-based pulmonary rehabilitation did not improve exercise capacity or health-related quality of life more than weekly social telephone calls.
Conference Start Date: 2018-03-23
Conference End Date: 2018-03-27
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/resp.13267
ISSN: 1440-1843
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/38112
Type: Conference Abstract
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Conferences

Show full item record

Page view(s)

24
checked on Jan 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.