Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39520
Title: Heated and humidified inspired gas through heated humidifiers in comparison to non-heated and non-humidified gas in hospitalised neonates receiving respiratory support.
Authors: Stewart A. ;Todd D.A.;Mcgrory L.;Foster J.P.;Tan K. ;Doctor T.N.
Institution: (Doctor, Stewart) Monash Medical Centre, Monash Newborn, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia (Foster) Western Sydney University, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Penrith DC, Australia (Foster) University of Sydney, Sydney Nursing School/Central Clinical School, Discipline of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, Sydney, Australia (Foster) Ingham Research Institute, Liverpool, NSW, Australia (Tan) Monash University, Department of Paediatrics, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, VIC 3168, Australia (Todd) The Canberra Hospital, Neonatal Unit, Centre for Newborn Care, PO Box 11, Woden, Canberra, ACT 2606, Australia (Mcgrory) The Royal Women's Hospital, Neonatal Services, Parkville, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 29-Mar-2017
Copyright year: 2017
Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Ltd (Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom)
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017 (2) (no pagination), 2017. Article Number: CD012549. Date of Publication: 24 Feb 2017.
Journal: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (Intervention). The objectives are as follows: To determine the effects of heated and humidified inspiratory gas through heated humidifiers (HHs) compared to non-heated and non-humidified inspiratory gas on mortality and morbidity in neonates receiving respiratory support during resuscitation immediately after birth and after the initial resuscitation. Comparison 1: Heated and humidified inspiratory gas through heated humidifiers (HHs) compared to non-heated and non-humidified inspiratory gas on mortality and morbidity in neonates receiving respiratory support during resuscitation immediately after birth. Proposed subgroup analyses: Gestational age: < 30 weeks, 30-36 weeks, 37 weeks and over; Mode of respiratory support (e.g. mask continuous positive airway pressure, mask intermittent positive pressure ventilation, endotracheal intermittent positive pressure ventilation). Comparison 2: Heated and humidified inspiratory gas through heated humidifiers (HHs) compared to non-heated and non-humidified inspiratory gas on mortality and morbidity in neonates receiving respiratory support after initial resuscitation. Proposed subgroup analyses: Gestational age: < 30 weeks, 30-36 weeks, 37 weeks and over; Mode of respiratory support (e.g. low flow oxygen, high flow nasal cannula, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation, conventional mechanical ventilation, high frequency ventilation). Sites of intervention: Neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), operating theatre or neonatal transport. Underlying respiratory conditions: respiratory distress syndrome, apnoea of prematurity, meconium aspiration syndrome, perinatal asphyxia, pneumonia.Copyright © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012549
ISSN: 1469-493X (electronic)
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39520
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on May 17, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.