Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39916
Title: National stroke registries for monitoring and improving the quality of hospital care: A systematic review.
Authors: Dennis M.S.;Norrving B.;Meretoja A.;Schwamm L.H.;Kapral M.K.;Lannin N.A.;Kim J.;Cadilhac D.A.
Institution: (Cadilhac, Kim) Stroke and Ageing Research, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia (Cadilhac, Kim, Meretoja) Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia (Lannin) College of Science, Health and Engineering, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC, Australia (Lannin) Alfred Health, Prahran, Australia (Kapral) Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (Schwamm) Department of Neurology, Stroke Service Division, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States (Dennis) Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom (Norrving) Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurology, Lund University, Sweden (Meretoja) Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia (Meretoja) Department of Neurology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
Issue Date: 16-Jan-2016
Copyright year: 2016
Publisher: Blackwell Publishing Ltd (E-mail: claims@sagepub.com)
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: International Journal of Stroke. 11 (1) (pp 28-40), 2016. Date of Publication: 01 Jan 2016.
Journal: International Journal of Stroke
Abstract: Background: Routine monitoring of the quality of stroke care is becoming increasingly important since patient outcomes could be improved with better access to proven treatments. It remains unclear how many countries have established a national registry for monitoring stroke care. Aim(s): To describe the current status of national, hospital-based stroke registries that have a focus on monitoring access to evidence-based care and patient outcomes and to summarize the main features of these registries. Summary of review: We undertook a systematic search of the published literature to identify the registries that are considered in their country to represent a national standardized dataset for acute stroke care and outcomes. Our initial keyword search yielded 5002 potential papers, of which we included 316 publications representing 28 national stroke registries from 26 countries. Where reported, data were most commonly collected with a waiver of patient consent (70%). Most registries used web-based systems for data collection (57%) and 25% used data linkage. Few variables were measured consistently among the registries reflecting their different local priorities. Funding, resource requirements, and coverage also varied. Conclusion(s): This review provides an overview of the current use of national stroke registries, a description of their common features relevant to monitoring stroke care in hospitals. Formal registration and description of registries would facilitate better awareness of efforts in this field.Copyright © 2016 World Stroke Organization.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1747493015607523
PubMed URL: 26763018 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=26763018]
ISSN: 1747-4930
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39916
Type: Review
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

14
checked on Sep 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.