Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39936
Title: Rest and stress transluminal attenuation gradient and contrast opacification difference for detection of hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.
Authors: Crossett M.;Ko B.S.;Cameron J.D.;Gutman S.;Wong D.T.L.;Munnur K.;Seneviratne S. ;Meredith I.T. 
Institution: (Ko, Seneviratne, Cameron, Gutman, Crossett, Munnur, Meredith, Wong) Department of Medicine Monash Medical Centre (MMC), Monash Cardiovascular Research Centre, MonashHEART, Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Crossett) Department of Diagnostic Imaging, MMC, Monash Health and Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Wong) South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, Australia (Ko) Monash Heart, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
Issue Date: 5-Aug-2016
Copyright year: 2016
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Place of publication: Netherlands
Publication information: International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 32 (7) (pp 1131-1141), 2016. Date of Publication: 01 Jul 2016.
Journal: International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Abstract: This study evaluated the feasibility of stress 320 detector CT coronary angiography (CTA) derived transluminal attenuation gradient (TAG320) and contrast opacification (CO) difference to detect hemodynamically significant stenoses as determined by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR <= 0.80). Twenty-seven patients, including 51 vessels on rest CTA were studied. 16 (31 %) vessels were not interpretable on stress CTA largely secondary to motion artefacts. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed a comparable area under the curve (AUC) for rest and stress TAG320 (0.78 and 0.75) which was higher than CTA alone (0.68), and rest and stress CO difference (0.76 and 0.67). Compared with rest CTA, stress CTA demonstrated inferior image quality (Median Likert score 4 vs. 3, P < 0.0001) and required a higher mean radiation exposure (3.2 vs. 5.1 mSv, P < 0.0001). Stress TAG320 and CO difference is less feasible and was not superior in diagnostic performance when compared with rest TAG320 and CO difference.Copyright © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10554-016-0867-3
PubMed URL: 26951537 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=26951537]
ISSN: 1569-5794
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/39936
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

180
checked on Oct 10, 2026

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.