Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40462
Title: Nasogastric Hydration in Infants with Bronchiolitis Less Than 2 Months of Age.
Authors: Babl F.E.;Oakley E.;Bata S.;Rengasamy S.;Krieser D.;Cheek J.;Jachno K.
Monash Health Department(s): Emergency Medicine
Institution: (Oakley, Bata, Rengasamy, Babl) Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital Victoria, Parkville, Victoria, Australia (Krieser) Department of Emergency Medicine and Pediatrics, Sunshine Hospital, St Albans, Victoria, Australia (Cheek) Department of Emergency Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia (Jachno) Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 23-Nov-2016
Copyright year: 2016
Publisher: Mosby Inc. (E-mail: customerservice@mosby.com)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Journal of Pediatrics. 178 (pp 241-245.e1), 2016. Date of Publication: 01 Nov 2016.
Journal: Journal of Pediatrics
Abstract: Objectives To determine whether nasogastric hydration can be used in infants less than 2 months of age with bronchiolitis, and characterize the adverse events profile of these infants compared with infants given intravenous (IV) fluid hydration. Study design A descriptive retrospective cohort study of children with bronchiolitis under 2 months of age admitted for hydration at 3 centers over 3 bronchiolitis seasons was done. We determined type of hydration (nasogastric vs IV fluid hydration) and adverse events, intensive care unit admission, and respiratory support. Results Of 491 infants under 2 months of age admitted with bronchiolitis, 211 (43%) received nonoral hydration: 146 (69%) via nasogastric hydration and 65 (31%) via IV fluid hydration. Adverse events occurred in 27.4% (nasogastric hydration) and 23.1% (IV fluid hydration), difference of 4.3%; 95%CI (-8.2 to 16.9), P=.51. The majority of adverse events were desaturations (21.9% nasogastric hydration vs 21.5% IV fluid hydration, difference 0.4%; [-11.7 to 12.4], P=.95). There were no pulmonary aspirations in either group. Apneas and bradycardias were similar in each group. IV fluid hydration use was positively associated with intensive care unit admission (38.5% IV fluid hydration vs 19.9% nasogastric hydration; difference 18.6%, [5.1-32.1], P=.004); and use of ventilation support (27.7% IV fluid hydration vs 15.1% nasogastric hydration; difference 12.6 [0.3-23], P=.03). Fewer infants changed from nasogastric hydration to IV fluid hydration than from IV fluid hydration to nasogastric hydration (12.3% vs 47.7%; difference -35.4% [-49 to -22], P<.001). Conclusions Nasogastric hydration can be used in the majority of young infants admitted with bronchiolitis. Nasogastric hydration and IV fluid hydration had similar rates of complications.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.07.012
PubMed URL: 27522439 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=27522439]
ISSN: 0022-3476
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40462
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

44
checked on Feb 6, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.