Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40570
Title: The effect of prehabilitation on the range of motion and functional outcomes in patients following the total knee or hip arthroplasty: A pilot randomized trial.
Authors: Biggs L.;Whelan L. ;McKeever J.;Munro A.;McKenzie K.;Cavill S.;Haines T.P.;Skinner E.H.
Monash Health Department(s): Occupational Health and Safety
Occupational Therapy
Physiotherapy
Allied Health
Institution: (Cavill, McKenzie) a Department of Physiotherapy , Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health , Clayton , Victoria , Australia (Munro) b Department of Occupational Therapy , Alfred Hospital , Prahran , Victoria , Australia (McKeever) c Department of Occupational Therapy , Dandenong Hospital, Monash Health , Dandenong , Victoria , Australia (Whelan, Biggs) d Department of Physiotherapy, Community Rehabilitation , Monash Health , Cranbourne , Victoria , Australia (Skinner, Haines) e Allied Health Research Unit, Monash Medical Centre, Monash Health , Clayton , Victoria , Australia (Skinner) f Department of Physiotherapy , Sunshine Hospital, Western Health, Sunshine , Victoria , Australia (Haines) g Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Science , Monash University , Frankston , Victoria , Australia
Issue Date: 19-Apr-2017
Copyright year: 2016
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Physiotherapy theory and practice. 32 (4) (pp 262-270), 2016. Date of Publication: 01 May 2016.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the effect of prehabilitation on the quality of life and function in patients having total knee replacement (TKR)/total hip replacement (THR). METHODS: A pilot randomized controlled trial with concealed allocation, assessor blinding, and intention-to-treat analysis was conducted. Sixty-four people undergoing elective lower-limb arthroplasty were included. Prehabilitation included one-hour twice-weekly sessions for at least three and a maximum of four weeks prior to surgery. Control participants did not complete any pre-surgical programs. Health utility and quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-3L and the patient-specific functional scale were the primary outcomes measured before allocation and eight weeks post-operatively. RESULTS: No between-group differences were evident in health utility (main effect of the group -0.04 (95% Confidence Interval [CI] -0.16 to 0.08, p = 0.50) or patient-specific functional scale (main effect of the group -0.59 (95% CI -1.8 to 0.6, p = 0.73), but the group-by-joint interaction effects for the timed up and go (TUG) (7.6 (95% CI -0.9 to 16.1, p = 0.08)) and the EQ-5D VAS (-18.3 (95% CI -41.1 to 4.5), p = 0.11) were larger. Prehabilitation participants' knee flexion improved by 12.6 degrees (95% CI 5.2-20, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Prehabilitation improved knee flexion, but this did not translate into improved functional mobility or quality of life.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2016.1138174
PubMed URL: 27050325 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=27050325]
ISSN: 1532-5040 (electronic)
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40570
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

52
checked on Jan 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.