Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40814
Title: Transfusion interventions in critical bleeding requiring massive transfusion: A systematic review.
Authors: Crighton G.;Engelbrecht S.;Gotmaker R.;Brunskill S.J.;Murphy M.F.;Wood E.M.;McQuilten Z.K. 
Institution: (McQuilten) Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society (ANZICS) Research Centre, Melbourne, Australia (McQuilten, Crighton, Engelbrecht, Wood) Transfusion Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia (Gotmaker) Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia (Brunskill, Murphy) Systematic Reviews Initiative, NHS Blood and Transplant/Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom
Issue Date: 24-Apr-2015
Copyright year: 2015
Publisher: W.B. Saunders
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Transfusion Medicine Reviews. 29 (2) (pp 127-137), 2015. Date of Publication: 01 Apr 2015.
Journal: Transfusion Medicine Reviews
Abstract: Critical bleeding (CB) requiring massive transfusion (MT) can occur in a variety of clinical contexts and is associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. In 2011, the Australian National Blood Authority (NBA) published patient blood management guidelines for CB and MT, which found limited high-quality evidence from which only 2 recommendations could be made. The aim of this systematic review (SR) was to update these guidelines and identify evidence gaps still to be addressed. A comprehensive search was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and SRs using MeSH index and free text terms in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2012), EMBASE, CINHAL, PUBMED, and the Transfusion Evidence Library up to July 15, 2014. The evidence was grouped according to 4 questions based on the original guideline relating to transfusion interventions: (1) effect of dose, timing, and ratio of red blood cells (RBCs) to component therapy on patient outcomes; (2) effect of RBC transfusion on patient outcomes; (3) effect of fresh frozen plasma, platelet, cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen concentrate, and prothrombin complex concentrate on patient outcomes; and (4) effect of recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) on patient outcomes. From this search, 19 studies were identified: 6 RCTs and 13 SRs. Two of the RCTs were pilot/feasibility studies, 3 were investigating rFVIIa, and 1 compared restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion in upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Overall, limited new evidence was identified and substantial evidence gaps remain, particularly with regard to the effect of component therapies, including ratio of RBC to component therapies, on patient outcomes. Clinical trials to address these questions are required.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tmrv.2015.01.001
PubMed URL: 25716645 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=25716645]
ISSN: 0887-7963
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/40814
Type: Review
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

54
checked on Feb 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.