Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/42065
Title: Validation of two depression screening instruments in a sleep disorders clinic. [Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine]
Authors: Dhar A.;Dabscheck E.;Barton D.;Law M.;Naughton M.T.
Institution: (Law, Naughton, Dabscheck) Alfred Hospital and Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia (Dhar, Barton) Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 27-Jun-2014
Copyright year: 2014
Publisher: American Academy of Sleep Medicine (2510 N. Frontage Road, Darien IL 60561, United States)
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 10 (6) (pp 683-688), 2014. Date of Publication: 2014.
Journal: Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine
Abstract: Study Objectives: Depression is a commonly diagnosed comorbidity in sleep disorder clinics. However, screening instruments for major depressive episode (MDE) have not been validated in this setting. We aimed to validate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Beck Depression Inventory - Fast Screen (BDI-FS) with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) in patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Design(s): Cross-sectional study. Setting(s): Academic center. Participant(s): One hundred one new patients with a clinical suspicion of OSA, as assessed by a sleep physician. Measurements: MDE, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and panic disorder (PD) were assessed by (1) a diagnostic interview utilizing the MINI and (2) by two self-report questionnaires: HADS and BDI-FS. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was undertaken to assess which HADS and BDI-FS threshold yielded the highest correlation for a diagnosis of MDE and/or GAD/PD as assessed with an interview conducted using the MINI. Result(s): A HADS-Depression score >= 8 gave optimal sensitivity (83.1%) and specificity (83.3%) with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) 0.851 for predicting the diagnosis of MDE. A HADS-Anxiety score >= 11 gave an optimal sensitivity (93.1%) and specificity (84.7%) with an AUC 0.911 for predicting the diagnosis of GAD/PD. A BDI-FS threshold >= 6 gave optimal sensitivity (86.7%) and specificity (82.9%) with an AUC 0.897 for MDE. Conclusion(s): The HADS and BDI-FS are accurate screening instruments with high concurrent validity for identifying the probability of a patient having MDE and - in the case of HADS-GAD and PD disorder in a sleep disorders clinic.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3802
PubMed URL: 24932150 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=24932150]
ISSN: 1550-9389
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/42065
Type: Article
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.