Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/42550
Title: Paediatric urological investigations - Dose comparison between urology-related and CT irradiation.
Authors: Ditchfield M.;Page M.;Florescu C.;Johnstone L.;Habteslassie D.
Institution: (Page, Florescu, Ditchfield) Diagnostic Imaging, Southern Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, 3168, Australia (Ditchfield) Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Johnstone) Department of Paediatrics, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia (Habteslassie, Ditchfield) Department of Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 15-Jul-2013
Copyright year: 2013
Publisher: Springer Verlag (Tiergartenstrasse 17, Heidelberg D-69121, Germany)
Place of publication: Germany
Publication information: Pediatric Radiology. 43 (7) (pp 846-850), 2013. Date of Publication: July 2013.
Abstract: Background: Urological investigation in children frequently involves high radiation doses; however, the issue of radiation for these investigations receives little attention compared with CT. Objective(s): To compare the radiation dose from paediatric urological investigations with CT, which is commonly regarded as the more major source of radiation exposure. Material(s) and Method(s): We conducted a retrospective audit in a tertiary paediatric centre of the number and radiation dose of CT scans, micturating cystourethrography exams and urological nuclear medicine scans from 2006 to 2011. This was compared with radiation doses in the literature and an audit of the frequency of these studies in Australia. Result(s): The tertiary centre audit demonstrated that the ratio of the frequency of urological to CT examinations was 0.8:1 in children younger than 17 years. The ratio of the radiation dose of urological to CT examinations was 0.7:1. The ratio in children younger than 5 years was 1.9:1. In Australia the frequency of urological procedures compared with CT was 0.4:1 in children younger than 17 years and 3.1:1 in those younger than 5 years. The ratio of radiation-related publications was 1:9 favouring CT. Conclusion(s): The incidence and radiation dose of paediatric urological studies is comparable to those of CT. Nevertheless the radiation dose of urological procedures receives considerably less attention in the literature. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00247-013-2635-z
PubMed URL: 23381302 [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=23381302]
ISSN: 0301-0449
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/42550
Type: Article
Subjects: cystourethrography
adolescent
article
Australia
child
*child urology
*computer assisted tomography
human
infant
*irradiation
medical audit
pediatric hospital
preschool child
priority journal
radiation dose
retrospective study
urological procedure
infant
*irradiation
medical audit
pediatric hospital
preschool child
priority journal
radiation dose
retrospective study
urological procedure
*computer assisted tomography
*child urology
adolescent
human
child
Australia
article
cystourethrography
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

16
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.