Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/47335
Title: Model-based iterative reconstruction in CT of paranasal sinuses in cystic fibrosis.
Authors: Lin S.;Lau K.K.
Monash Health Department(s): Radiology
Institution: (Lin, Lau) Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia
(Lau) School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
(Lau) Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Issue Date: 14-Mar-2022
Copyright year: 2021
Publisher: W.B. Saunders Ltd
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Clinical Radiology. 76(12) (pp 930-934), 2021. Date of Publication: December 2021.
Journal: Clinical Radiology
Abstract: AIM: To assess image quality and dose-reduction efficacy of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in computed tomography (CT) of the paranasal sinus (CTPNS) compared with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Unenhanced CTPNS studies performed in adult CF patients from 2014 to 2020 were included. MBIR and ASIR were used and compared. Two radiologists assessed the CT images blindly and randomly. Quantitative assessment of noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was performed in the maxillary sinus, sphenoid body, temporalis, and background air. Qualitative assessment performed included image sharpness, noise and contrast. RESULT(S): Thirty-seven MBIR and 45 ASIR CT PNS studies were included. MBIR achieved a 74% effective median dose reduction (0.039 mSv) compared with ASIR (0.147 mSv). Measured noise was significantly lower in all regions using MBIR (p<0.001) with superior SNR (p<0.001). MBIR had higher CNR compared to ASIR (4.567 versus 2.03, p<0.001). MBIR images were sharper and less noisy, with equal contrast. Cohen's weighted kappa value was 0.824 for qualitative analysis, indicating good inter-rater agreement. Both methods had 100% diagnostic acceptability. CONCLUSION(S): MBIR produces high-quality CTPNS images at a significantly lower dose compared with ASIR. It is the preferred imaging surveillance method in CF patients and may have roles in other patient cohorts.Copyright © 2021 The Royal College of Radiologists
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2021.09.008
PubMed URL: 34579861 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=34579861]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/47335
Type: Article
Subjects: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
computer assisted tomography
contrast to noise ratio
cystic fibrosis
image quality
maxillary sinus
model based iterative reconstruction
paranasal sinus
qualitative analysis
radiation dose reduction
signal noise ratio
single blind procedure
sinusitis/di sphenoid
temporalis muscle
computed tomography scanner
picture archiving and communication system
image contrast
image sharpness
Discovery CT750HD
MBIR
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.