Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48010
Title: Mobilization During Critical Illness: A Higher Level of Mobilization Improves Health Status at 6 Months, a Secondary Analysis of a Prospective Cohort Study.
Authors: Paton M. ;Lane R. ;Paul E.;Cuthburtson G.A.;Hodgson C.L.
Monash Health Department(s): Physiotherapy
Allied Health
Institution: (Paton, Paul, Cuthburtson, Hodgson) Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Paton) Department of Physiotherapy, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
(Lane) College of Health and Biomedicine, Victoria University, Footscray, VIC, Australia
(Cuthburtson, Hodgson) Department of Physiotherapy, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 23-Jun-2022
Copyright year: 2021
Publisher: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Critical Care Medicine. 49(9) (pp E860-E869), 2021. Date of Publication: 01 Sep 2021.
Journal: Critical Care Medicine
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of active mobilization during critical illness on health status in survivors 6 months post ICU admission. DESIGN: Post hoc secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study conducted between November 2013 and March 2015. SETTING: Two tertiary hospital ICU's in Victoria, Australia. PATIENTS: Of 194 eligible patients admitted, mobility data for 186 patients were obtained. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were as per the original trial. INTERVENTIONS: The dosage of mobilization in ICU was measured by: 1) the Intensive Care Mobility Scale where a higher Intensive Care Mobility Scale level was considered a higher intensity of mobilization or 2) the number of active mobilization sessions performed during the ICU stay. The data were extracted from medical records and analyzed against Euro-quality of life-5D-5 Level version answers obtained from phone interviews with survivors 6 months following ICU admission. The primary outcome was change in health status measured by the Euro-quality of life-5D-5 Level utility score, with change in Euro-quality of life-5D-5 Level mobility domain a secondary outcome. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Achieving higher levels of mobilization (as per the Intensive Care Mobility Scale) was independently associated with improved outcomes at 6 months (Euro-quality of life-5D-5 Level utility score unstandardized regression coefficient [beta] 0.022 [95% CI, 0.002-0.042]; p = 0.033; Euro-quality of life-5D-5 Level mobility domain beta = 0.127 [CI, 0.049-0.205]; p = 0.001). Increasing the number of active mobilization sessions was not found to independently influence health status. Illness severity, total comorbidities, and admission diagnosis also independently influenced health status. CONCLUSION(S): In critically ill survivors, achieving higher levels of mobilization, but not increasing the number of active mobilization sessions, improved health status 6 months after ICU admission.Copyright © 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005058
PubMed URL: 33967203 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=33967203]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48010
Type: Article
Subjects: artificial ventilation
critical illness
intensive care unit
length of stay
mobilization
survivor
telephone tertiary care center
intensive care mobility scale
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

38
checked on Jan 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.