Speaking out: psychiatry, advocacy and politics.

Abstract

Background: Those with psychiatric training increasing need to engage in public discourse to advocate for the best outcomes for our patients and to ensure that psychiatric practice remains relevant within a rapidly evolving mental health (MH) system. Yet, many clinicians may feel unsure about their role in public advocacy, or may lack the practical skills to engage in this work. Furthermore, clinicians who do speak out may become the subject of abuse from outside the profession or may be subject to professional rivalry from within. This panel will explore the intersection of psychiatry, advocacy and politics. Objective(s): We aim to (1) examine the intersection of psychiatry, advocacy and politics; (2) discuss the role of psychiatrists within public advocacy domains; and (3) explore the common pitfalls, barriers or criticisms faced by psychiatrists who speak out. Method(s): The panel will hear the perspectives of two psychiatrists (Professor Pat McGorry and Professor Ian Hickie) and two trainees (Dr Skye Kinder and Dr Tahnee Bridson) whose public advocacy efforts have led to significant change. The panel will be moderated by Dr Kieran Allen, who has experience in advocacy as both a psychiatry trainee and someone who lives with mental ill health. Conclusion(s): Collectively, we must accept our responsibility to act as agents of change to continue to improve the delivery of care to our patients. It is imperative that psychiatrists and trainees feel empowered to participate in advocacy efforts, and that we support those advocates among us to ensure psychiatry remains a critical aspect of MH care for the community.