Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48923
Title: Outcomes of ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stent for pregnancy with urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Authors: Jin X.;Liu B.;Xiong Y.;Wang Y.;Tu W.;Shao Y.;Zhang L.;Wang D.
Institution: (Jin, Liu, Tu, Shao) Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China
(Xiong) Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shanghai TCM College Affiliated Shu Guang Hospital, Shanghai, China
(Wang) Monash Health, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia
(Zhang) School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
(Zhang) Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, 3100, Australia. tony1982110@gmail.com
(Zhang) Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Parkville, VIC, 3100, Australia. tony1982110@gmail.com
(Wang) Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai 200025, China
Issue Date: 21-Sep-2022
Copyright year: 2022
Publisher: NLM (Medline)
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: BMC urology. 22(1) (pp 150), 2022. Date of Publication: 14 Sep 2022.
Journal: BMC Urology
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcomes of internal ureteral stents in comparison with ureteroscopy (URS) for pregnant women with urolithiasis. DATA SOURCES: Relevant studies published from January 1980 to June 2022 were identified through systematic literature searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: A total of 499 studies were initially identified. We included pregnant women in any stages of gestation who underwent double-J (D-J) stent insertion only or ureteroscopy for the treatment of urolithiasis; for a study to be included, the number of participants needed to exceed 10. This systematic review was registered on the PROSPERO website (Reference: CRD42020195607). RESULT(S): A total of 25 studies were identified with 131 cases undergoing serial stenting and 789 cases undergoing URS. The pooled operative success rate was 97% for D-J stent insertion and 99% for URS. Only a few patients passed stones spontaneously after serial D-J stenting. The pooled stone free rate (SFR) in URS operations was about 91%. For internal ureteral stent therapy, the rate of normal fertility outcomes was 99%, although the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 45%. For group receiving URS treatment, the rate of normal fertility outcome was 99% and the pooled incidence of complications was approximately 1%. However, the pooled rate of premature birth and abortion were the similar between the two groups (<1%); the rate of serious complications was also similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION(S): Although internal ureteral stents may cause more minor complications, both ureteroscopy and internal ureteral stents showed had low rates of adverse effects on fertility outcomes when used to treat pregnant women with symptomatic urolithiasis. Evidence suggests that URS may have a greater advantage for pregnant patients with urinary stones when conditions permit. Since, it has been proven to be safe and effective, internal ureteral stents could be considered in emergency or other special situations.Copyright © 2022. The Author(s).
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-022-01100-w
PubMed URL: 36104697 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=36104697]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/48923
Type: Article
Subjects: pregnancy
stent
ureter
ureter stone
ureteroscopy
urolithiasis
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.