Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/49921
Title: Efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
Authors: Lim P.Q.X.;Lithgow M.J.;Kaminski M.R.;Landorf K.B.;Menz H.B.;Munteanu S.E.
Monash Health Department(s): Podiatry
Allied Health
Institution: (Lim, Lithgow, Kaminski, Landorf, Menz, Munteanu) Discipline of Podiatry, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Lim, Lithgow, Landorf, Menz, Munteanu) La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Kaminski) Department of Podiatry, Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
(Kaminski) School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 27-Jun-2023
Copyright year: 2023
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Place of publication: Germany
Publication information: Rheumatology International. 43(8) (pp 1409-1422), 2023. Date of Publication: August 2023.
Journal: Rheumatology International
Abstract: This systematic review aims to investigate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot osteoarthritis (OA). Key databases and trial registries were searched from inception to 23 February 2023. All trials investigating non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA were included. Quality assessment was performed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Outcomes were pain, function, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. Effects (mean differences, standardised mean differences, risk ratios) were calculated where possible for the short (0 to 12 weeks), medium (> 12 to 52 weeks), and long (> 52 weeks) term. Six trials (231 participants) were included (one feasibility trial and five case series) - all were judged to be of poor methodological quality. Two trials reported arch contouring foot orthoses to exert no-to-large effects on pain in the short and medium term, and small-to-very-large effects on function in the short and medium term. Two trials reported shoe stiffening inserts to exert medium-to-huge effects on pain in the short term, and small effects on function in the short term. Two trials of image-guided intra-articular corticosteroid injections reported favourable effects on pain in the short term, small effects on pain and function in the medium term, and minimal long term effects. Two trials reported minor adverse events, and none reported health-related quality of life outcomes. The current evidence suggests that arch contouring foot orthoses, shoe stiffening inserts and corticosteroid injections may be effective for midfoot OA. Rigorous randomised trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of non-surgical interventions for midfoot OA.Copyright © 2023, The Author(s).
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00296-023-05324-3
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/49921
Type: Review
Subjects: foot pain
injection site reaction
interventional radiology
interventional ultrasonography
musculoskeletal disease
obesity
osteoarthritis
quality of life
bupivacaine
levobupivacaine
lidocaine
methylprednisolone acetate
foot orthosis
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

36
checked on Jan 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.