Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50288
Title: Physiotherapy services in intensive care. A workforce survey of Australia and New Zealand.
Authors: Thomas P.;Chaseling W.;Marais L.;Matheson C.;Paton M. ;Swanepoel N.
Monash Health Department(s): Physiotherapy
Allied Health
Institution: (Thomas) Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
(Chaseling) St George Hospital, Kogarah, Australia
(Marais) Health New Zealand, South Canterbury, Timaru, New Zealand
(Matheson) Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
(Paton) Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
(Swanepoel) Health New Zealand, Takapuna, Auckland, New Zealand
Issue Date: 29-Aug-2023
Copyright year: 2023
Publisher: NLM (Medline)
Place of publication: Australia
Publication information: Australian critical care. 36(5) (pp 806-812), 2023. Date of Publication: 01 Sep 2023.
Journal: Australian Critical Care
Abstract: BACKGROUND: In Australia and New Zealand, there are currently no recommendations to guide staffing levels for intensive care unit (ICU) physiotherapy services, and there is limited information about the current services provided. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to document the profile of intensive care physiotherapy services currently offered in Australia and New Zealand. METHOD(S): A binational survey was distributed to physiotherapists. The survey sought information on staffing and service profiles for weekday, weekend, and after-hour services including on-call and evening shifts. RESULT(S): Eighty-six sites completed the survey, with responses primarily from Level 3 (47/86, 55%) and public ICUs (74/86, 86%). For weekday services, the ratio of full-time equivalent physiotherapy staff allocated per bed was similar between all intensive care levels (0.11 [0.08-0.15], p = 0.421). Thirty respondents (35%) were satisfied with their staffing and reported higher levels of physiotherapy staff per bed (0.15 [0.1-0.2], p < 0.001). Most sites reported lower levels of staffing for weekend services (76/86, 88%), and many physiotherapists indicated that they were not satisfied with this service (55/86, 64%). Most Level 2, Level 3, and paediatric ICUs had a designated senior physiotherapist, with similar levels of senior physiotherapy staff allocated per bed between all ICU levels (0.05 [0.03-0.08], p = 0.844). Few sites reported dedicated staff attributed to intensive care education, research, tracheostomy service, or outreach roles. On-call physiotherapy services were available in 49 of 86 (57%) hospitals surveyed; however, utilisation of the service by ICUs was mainly reported to be less than once per month (19/49, 39%). CONCLUSION(S): Physiotherapy staffing ratios were similar across different ICU levels. While weekend services are available for most ICUs, staffing levels are reduced. Higher staffing ratios were associated with higher levels of satisfaction to complete professional roles and responsibilities.Copyright © 2022 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aucc.2022.11.004
PubMed URL: 36577615 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=36577615]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50288
Type: Article
Subjects: intensive care
paediatric intensive care unit
physiotherapy
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Qualitative study
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

12
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.