Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50422
Title: The burden of radiation exposure in children requiring percutaneous nephrolithotomy.
Authors: Taghavi K.;Kusel A.;Webb N.;McCahy P.;Badawy M. ;Ditchfield M.
Monash Health Department(s): Paediatric - Urology
Radiology
Urology
Institution: (Taghavi, Kusel, Webb) Department of Paediatric Urology, Monash Children's Hospital, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
(Taghavi, Ditchfield) Department of Paediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
(McCahy) Department of Urology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia
(Webb, McCahy) School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
(Badawy, Ditchfield) Monash Health Imaging, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
(Badawy) Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
Issue Date: 5-Oct-2023
Copyright year: 2023
Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
Place of publication: United Kingdom
Publication information: Journal of Pediatric Urology. 19(5) (pp 559.e1-559.e7), 2023. Date of Publication: October 2023.
Journal: Journal of Pediatric Urology
Abstract: Background: Children undergoing investigation and management for complex upper tract urolithiasis often require multimodal imaging. The significance of related radiation exposure in stone care pathways has received little attention in the published literature. Study design: Medical records of paediatric patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy were retrospectively analysed to ascertain the modalities used and determine extent of radiation exposure occurring during each care pathway. Radiation dose simulation and calculation was performed a priori. The cumulative effective dose (mSv) and cumulative organ dose (mGy) for radiosensitive organs was calculated. Result(s): A total of 140 imaging studies were included from the care pathways of 15 children with complex upper tract urolithiasis. Median follow-up was 9.6 years (range: 6.7-16.8 years). The average number of imaging studies with ionising radiation per patient was nine, with a cumulative effective dose of 18.3 mSv across all modalities. The most common modalities were: mobile fluoroscopy (43%), x-ray (24%), and computed tomography (18%). The cumulative effective dose per study type was greatest for CT (4.09 mSv), followed by fixed and mobile fluoroscopy (2.79 mSv and 1.82 mSv, respectively). Conclusion(s): There is high general awareness of radiation exposure involved in CT scanning with resultant caution in employing this modality in paediatric patients. However, the significant radiation exposure relating to fluoroscopy (whether fixed or mobile) is less well documented in children. We recommend implementing steps to minimise radiation exposure by optimisation and avoidance of certain modalities where possible. Paediatrics urologists must employ strategies to minimise radiation exposure in children with urolithiasis, given the significant exposures encountered.Copyright © 2023 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.05.010
PubMed URL: 37302924 [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=37302924]
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50422
Type: Article
Subjects: clinical computer assisted tomography
fluoroscopy
percutaneous nephrolithotomy
radiation dose
radiation exposure
urolithiasis
urologist
X ray
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Observational study (cohort, case-control, cross sectional, or survey)
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

8
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.