Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50598
Conference/Presentation Title: Long-Term Outcomes of Second-Line Vs Later-Line Zanubrutinib Treatment in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory MCL: An Updated Pooled Analysis.
Authors: Song Y.;Zhou K.;Zou D.;Li D.;Hu J.;Yang H.;Zhang H.;Ji J.;Xu W.;Jin J.;Lv F.;Feng R.;Gao S.;Zhou D.;Tam C.S.;Simpson D.;Wang M.L.;Phillips T.J.;Opat S. ;Fang C.;Sun S.;Zhu J.
Monash Health Department(s): Haematology
Institution: (Song) Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China, China
(Zhou) Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China, China
(Zou) State Key Laboratory of Experimental Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Blood Diseases, Haihe Laboratory of Cell Ecosystem, Institute of Hematology & Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical Colleg, Tianjin, China, China
(Li) Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, China
(Hu) Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China, China
(Yang) The Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences(Zhejiang Cancer Hospital),Institute of Basic Medicine and Cancer(IBMC),Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China, China
(Zhang) Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China, China
(Ji) West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China, China
(Xu) The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China, China
(Jin) The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University College of Medicine, Hangzhou, China, China
(Lv) Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, China
(Feng) Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, China
(Gao) The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China, China
(Zhou) Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, China
(Tam) Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St. Vincent's Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, Australia
(Simpson) North Shore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand, New Zealand
(Wang) MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
(Phillips) University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
(Opat) Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia, Australia
(Fang, Sun) BeiGene (Beijing) Co., Ltd., BeiJing, China, China
(Zhu) Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China, China
Presentation/Conference Date: 23-Nov-2023
Copyright year: 2022
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Publication information: Blood. Conference: 64th ASH Annual Meeting. New Orleans United States. 140(Supplement 1) (pp 6501-6503), 2022. Date of Publication: 15 Nov 2022.
Journal: Blood
Abstract: Introduction: Zanubrutinib as an effective treatment option for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has been approved in the United States and China as monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL. We previously reported results of a pooled analysis of two zanubrutinib studies (BGB-3111-206 and BGB-3111-AU-003) with a median follow-up of 24.9 months, and showed numerically better progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) when zanubrutinib was administered in the second line compared with administered in later lines for R/R MCL. Here, we present a longer follow-up (median 35.2 months) of the pooled data sets to compare long-term outcomes of second-line (with 1 prior line of therapy) vs later-line (with >1 prior lines of therapy) zanubrutinib treatment for R/R MCL patients. Method(s): Patient-level data were pooled for R/R MCL patients treated with zanubrutinib from a phase I study (BGB-3111-AU-003, NCT02343120) and a phase II study (BGB-3111-206, NCT03206970). The patients were divided into two groups based on the line of zanubrutinib: the second-line and the later-line group. Inverse propensity score weighting method was used to balance the baseline covariates between the groups to mimic a randomized controlled trial. The primary outcome measure was OS. Secondary outcomes included PFS, PFS rate and OS rate at 12, 24 and 36 months, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DOR). Survival probability was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox proportional hazards model was used to compute hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for PFS and OS. P value of less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. However, hypothesis testing was not pre-stated. The safety profile in each arm was summarized. Result(s): Among the 112 (79 in BGB-3111-206, 33 in BGB-3111-AU-003) patients with R/R MCL pooled, 41 (36.6%) received zanubrutinib as second-line therapy; 71 (63.4%) patients received as later-line. The median follow-up time for the second-line and the later-line group was 36.07 and 34.37 months, respectively. After weighting, all baseline covariates were balanced, and the prevalence of prior medication use in each group were preserved. OS was statistically significantly longer in the second-line group vs the later-line group (HR 0.459 [95% CI, 0.215-0.980], p = 0.044), with the median OS not reached in both groups (Figure). The median PFS was similar but numerically longer in the second-line group (27.8 months, 95% CI, 16.76-NE) vs the later-line group (22.1 months, 95% CI 16.62-45.50) (HR 0.78 [95% CI, 0.443-1.373], p = 0.389). Efficacy outcomes in each group are summarized in the Table below. The safety profile was similar between the two groups; zanubrutinib was generally well tolerated and there were no new safety concerns during the long-term follow-up. Conclusion(s): The long-term follow-up further confirmed that second-line zanubrutinib treatment was significantly associated with prolonged OS compared with later-line treatment in patients with R/R MCL. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Tam: LOXO: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria. Wang: VelosBio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pepromene Bio: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; OncLive: Honoraria; Vinverx: Research Funding; Eastern Virginia Medical School: Honoraria; Meeting Minds Experts: Honoraria; Medscape: Honoraria; Oncology Specialty Group: Honoraria; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; InnoCare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Oncternal: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; IDEOlogy Health: Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; MJH Life Sciences: Honoraria; Practice Point Communications (PPC): Honoraria; Studio ER Congressi: Honoraria; Moffit Cancer Center: Honoraria; LLC TS Oncology: Honoraria; Lilly: Consultancy, Research Funding; Physicians Education Resources (PER): Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding; BioInvent: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Merck: Honoraria; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Milken Institute: Consultancy; Deciphera: Consultancy; Leukemia & Lymphoma Society: Consultancy, Honoraria; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; AbbVie: Consultancy. Phillips: Xencor: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy, Other: Travel Expenses; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer: Consultancy; Epizyme: Consultancy; Eli Lilly: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Genmab: Consultancy. Opat: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy; AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding.Copyright © 2022 The American Society of Hematology
Conference Name: 64th ASH Annual Meeting
Conference Start Date: 2022-12-10
Conference End Date: 2022-12-13
Conference Location: New Orleans, United States
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-162135
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50598
Type: Conference Abstract
Subjects: lymphoma
middle monotherapy
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Randomised controlled trial
Appears in Collections:Conferences

Show full item record

Page view(s)

58
checked on Mar 15, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.