Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50814
Title: Newborn and infant parasympathetic evaluation (NIPETM) monitor for assessing pain during surgery and interventional procedures: a systematic review.
Authors: Sakthivel M.;Su V.;Nataraja R.M.;Pacilli M. 
Monash Health Department(s): Paediatric - General Surgery
Institution: (Sakthivel, Su, Nataraja, Pacilli) Department of Paediatric Surgery, Monash Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
(Sakthivel, Su, Nataraja, Pacilli) Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
(Nataraja, Pacilli) Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences., Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Issue Date: 5-Jan-2024
Copyright year: 2024
Publisher: W.B. Saunders
Place of publication: United States
Publication information: Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 59(4) (pp 672-677), 2024. Date of Publication: April 2024.
Journal: Journal of Pediatric Surgery
Abstract: Background: The heart rate variability-derived Newborn Infant Parasympathetic Evaluation (NIPE) monitor has been designed to be an objective, non-invasive tool for the assessment of pain and discomfort in children under 2 years of age. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the ability of NIPE to assess pain in neonates and infants during surgical and/or painful procedures. Method(s): A systematic review (2010-2023) was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Studies containing children above 2-years-old were excluded. The ROBINS-I (Risk of Bias in Non-randomised Studies of Interventions) tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Result(s): 9 databases were searched identifying 470 articles, 460 did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded; therefore, 10 studies with 548 participants were included. NIPE was used to assess intraoperative and postoperative pain for surgery under general anaesthesia (5 studies), as well as acute and prolonged pain from other interventional procedures (5 studies). For surgery under general anaesthesia: NIPE has shown to detect nociceptive events (e.g., skin incision, intubation), insufficient analgesia intraoperatively and to predict early postoperative pain. For painful interventional procedures: NIPE has shown to detect acute pain with a high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Conclusion(s): NIPE has been used to assess pain in surgery and for various painful procedures. NIPE can detect intraoperative pain and reflect early postoperative pain. NIPE may be useful in evaluating procedural pain, however with heterogenous outcomes, more studies are required to confirm its efficacy. Type of Study: Systematic Review. Level of Evidence: Level II.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s)
DOI: http://monash.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.12.008
URI: https://repository.monashhealth.org/monashhealthjspui/handle/1/50814
Type: Review
Subjects: analgesia
general anesthesia
intubation
postoperative pain
Type of Clinical Study or Trial: Systematic review and/or meta-analysis
Appears in Collections:Articles

Show full item record

Page view(s)

398
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in Monash Health Research Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.